Surcharge Compliance Auditing via Mobile Receipt Scanning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack an efficient method to audit transactions for compliance with surcharge rules, which are essential for ensuring fair payment processing and customer transparency in credit card transactions.

Innovation Solution

The development of apparatus and methods that utilize non-transitory computer-readable media to execute instructions for determining surcharge compliance scores, involving the receipt of surcharge compliance records and proof-of-compliance records from mobile devices, and comparing these records to transaction attributes to assess compliance with set surcharge rules.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual auditing methods are used to check surcharge compliance, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but auditing accuracy and efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauditing accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual auditing mechanisms with an automated computer-based system that receives transaction records, determines transaction costs, compares surcharges to costs, and generates compliance reports. This substitution of mechanical/manual processes with automated computational processes resolves the contradiction by dramatically improving auditing accuracy while keeping the system accessible through standard computing infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If comprehensive transaction auditing is performed to ensure surcharge compliance, then compliance accuracy is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance assuranceVSAvoidauditing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary determination of transaction costs and surcharge comparisons as transactions are being processed, rather than conducting comprehensive audits after all transactions are complete. By establishing compliance metrics continuously during transaction processing, the system ensures reliability without requiring separate time-consuming audit phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where compliance information is continuously generated and updated based on incoming transaction records. The system compares each transaction's surcharge against its transaction cost and updates compliance status in real-time, allowing continuous reliability assurance without batch processing delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of information

If detailed surcharge compliance monitoring is implemented, then customer transparency is improved, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation transparencyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential compliance information from transaction records - specifically comparing the surcharge amount to the transaction cost and determining whether the surcharge exceeds the cost. By focusing on this single critical comparison rather than analyzing all transaction details, the system maintains high information transparency for customers while keeping data processing relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS8972293B2Surcharge auditing
Publication Date: 2015.03.03 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US8972293B2 patent drawing
  • US8972293B2 patent drawing
  • US8972293B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus and methods for auditing a transaction record are provided. The transaction record may correspond to a credit card transaction. The auditing may include identifying a surcharge violation. The surcharge violation may be an unlawful surcharge. The auditing may identify patterns of double surcharging. Transaction-level auditing may include ensuring that a surcharge is returned upon a product return. A mobile wallet application may allow consumers to access and/or report merchant surcharge compliance activity. Functionality may include surcharge receipt scanning for use in crosschecking authenticity of a consumer report. Additional crosscheck functionality provided by geographic location support. Embodiments may include a registry for merchants that certify their surcharge calculations.