Surface Code Stabilizers for Defective Qubit Error Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing quantum computing systems face inefficiencies in error detection due to the presence of non-functional qubits, requiring longer measurement cycles and inefficient interleaving of X-type and Z-type gauge operators.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a quantum error correction code that combines gauge operators to form composite stabilizers, allowing for simultaneous measurement of X-type and Z-type stabilizers in each cycle, thereby adapting to non-functional qubits and enhancing error detection efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If gauge operators are densely packed and measured in each cycle, then error detection efficiency is improved, but the complexity of operator interleaving increases due to non-commuting X-type and Z-type gauge operators

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection efficiencyVSAvoidoperator interleaving complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the quantum system into functional and non-functional qubit regions, and further segments gauge operators into X-type and Z-type categories. This segmentation allows independent optimization of measurement cycles for each type, resolving the interleaving complexity while maintaining dense packing for improved error detection efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic measurement cycles where X-type and Z-type gauge operators are measured in alternating but synchronized periods. Each type of gauge operator is measured in every cycle, but with periodic alternation between types, achieving dense packing without requiring complex simultaneous interleaving of non-commuting operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Reliability

If measurement cycles are extended to accommodate non-functional qubits, then error detection coverage is improved, but the measurement time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection coverageVSAvoidmeasurement time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts non-functional qubits from the active measurement cycle by mapping gauge operators around them rather than through them. This allows measurement cycles to maintain their original timing while still achieving comprehensive error detection coverage, as the operators effectively skip over defective regions without extending the cycle duration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a two-dimensional spatial arrangement to a four-dimensional measurement space by adding temporal dimension (measurement cycles) and operator type dimension (X-type and Z-type). This allows gauge operators to be densely packed in the operator-type dimension and cycled through time, achieving comprehensive coverage without extending spatial measurement paths and thus avoiding increased measurement time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20260105348A1Surface Codes with Densely Packed Gauge Operators
Publication Date: 2026.04.16 GOOGLE LLC
  • US20260105348A1 patent drawing
  • US20260105348A1 patent drawing
  • US20260105348A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure is directed to implementing a quantum error correction code via a quantum computer that includes a set of functional qubits and a set of non-functional qubits. A set of gauge operators is formed. A set of gauge operator combinations are determined from the set of gauge operators. Determining the set of gauge operator combinations may be based on a subset of functional qubits and a global sequence of each gauge operator. Each gauge operator combination has a composite operator that commutes with the composite operator of each other gauge operator combination. A set of composite stabilizers may be generated. Each composite stabilizer corresponds to a separate gauge operator combination. The QEC code may be executed, via the QCS, based on the set of composite stabilizers.