Surface Conditioning Drag Tool with Adjustable Fencing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional surface conditioning tools for athletic fields lack control over material deposition, depth, and uniformity of top dressing layers, often requiring multiple passes and additional manual labor to achieve desired playing surface characteristics, while also failing to prevent compaction and maintain precise grading for drainage.

Innovation Solution

A surface conditioning drag tool with a tow-behind configuration and a fence system featuring lateral and medial undulating fencing members that adjust in pitch, allowing for precise control over top dressing layer depth and separation from the subsurface, minimizing compaction and surface markings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional surface conditioning tools are used, then the playing surface can be maintained, but control over material deposition depth and uniformity is poor, requiring multiple passes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetop dressing depth controlVSAvoidnumber of passes required
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The drag tool employs adjustable fencing members that can be positioned at different heights and angles relative to the ground surface. This dynamic adjustability allows operators to precisely control the depth of top dressing application by modifying the fence configuration, thereby achieving uniform depth control in a single pass without requiring multiple repetitions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the geometric parameters of the fencing members (height, angle, spacing) to optimize material deposition. By adjusting these parameters, the tool achieves precise control over top dressing depth and uniformity, eliminating the need for multiple passes while maintaining productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If conventional tools are used to groom the surface, then material can be moved, but undesired surface markings are left in the wake

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface grooming capabilityVSAvoidsurface markings
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The drag tool features fencing members with varying local characteristics - some portions have smoother surfaces while others have textured patterns. This local quality variation allows different sections of the fence to perform different functions: smoothing areas reduce surface markings while textured areas maintain grooming effectiveness, thus eliminating harmful surface markings while preserving ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Quantity of substance

If conventional tools are used, then top dressing can be applied, but separation from the compacted subsurface is not maintained, leading to compaction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetop dressing layerVSAvoidlayer separation
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The drag tool performs preliminary loosening action on the subsurface through its fence design that creates void spaces and reduces compaction before top dressing application. This preliminary action maintains the separation between the loose top dressing layer and the subsurface, preventing unwanted compaction while ensuring proper layer stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of operation

If conventional tools are used, then the playing surface can be maintained, but precise grading for drainage is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface maintenanceVSAvoidgrading precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The fencing members are designed with adjustable pitch and angle capabilities, allowing dynamic modification of the tool's interaction with the ground surface. This enables precise grading control to achieve proper drainage slopes while maintaining ease of operation, as operators can adjust the fence configuration to match specific drainage requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11483955B1Surface conditioning drag tools
Publication Date: 2022.11.01 ABI ATTACHMENTS INC
  • US11483955B1 patent drawing
  • US11483955B1 patent drawing
  • US11483955B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A surface conditioning drag tool apparatus includes a plurality of fencing members each extending laterally along a width of the drag tool and spaced apart from one another at a plurality of locations between a front end and a rear end of the drag tool. The plurality of fencing members include a plurality of lower ground contacting extremities and a plurality of upper extremities spaced apart from one another in height and a frame coupled with and positioned above the plurality of ground working fencing members.