Robot-Assisted Surface Defect Machining Using 3D Defect Categorization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for detecting and repairing surface defects in automated manufacturing, particularly in the automotive sector, are limited to manual intervention after detection, as they do not adapt machining processes to the specific characteristics of defects, leading to inconsistent quality and inefficiency.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for automated detection and robot-assisted machining of surface defects using optical inspection, three-dimensional measurement, and categorization of defects based on parameter sets, allowing for the selection of appropriate machining processes and generation of robot programs for precise machining paths.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated detection systems are implemented, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases due to multiple sensors and processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection and repair automationVSAvoidoptical inspection and measurement system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the defect repair process into distinct phases: detection by optical inspection system, classification by data processing device, and execution by robot. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in one function, improving overall automation while managing complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The robot system is designed with multi-functionality, serving both as a mobile platform for the optical inspection system and as the execution device for defect repair. This universal robot reduces the need for separate specialized equipment, thereby improving productivity without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If manual inspection and repair are used, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity decreases due to individual manual intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structureVSAvoiddefect repair throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service through automated defect classification and repair execution. The data processing device automatically categorizes defects based on sensor data, and the robot autonomously executes repair operations without requiring manual intervention for each defect, thereby significantly improving productivity while maintaining manageable system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where the optical inspection system continuously monitors the workpiece surface, the data processing device analyzes the detected defects, and the robot adjusts its repair actions based on real-time feedback. This closed-loop control enables high-speed automated operation while maintaining quality standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If generic machining processes are applied to all defects, then ease of operation is improved, but manufacturing precision decreases due to lack of defect-specific adaptation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining process selectionVSAvoiddefect repair quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by selecting and executing specific machining processes tailored to each defect category. Instead of using a uniform approach, the data processing device categorizes defects according to their characteristics and directs the robot to apply appropriate repair methods, ensuring high manufacturing precision for each specific defect type while maintaining ease of operation through automated process selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system utilizes parameter changes by adjusting machining parameters based on defect characteristics. The data processing device analyzes defect parameters such as size, shape, and location, then automatically selects and configures appropriate machining parameters for the robot, enabling precise repair without requiring manual parameter adjustment for each defect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If defect-specific machining processes are implemented, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to multiple process requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect repair qualityVSAvoidmachining process variety
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamics by making the machining process selection adaptive and flexible. The data processing device dynamically selects and configures machining processes based on real-time defect analysis, allowing the system to handle diverse defect types with high precision while maintaining a unified automated workflow that manages complexity through software-based process orchestration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables fully automated detection and reproducible machining of surface defects, ensuring consistent quality by adapting machining processes to defect characteristics, reducing manual intervention and improving efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

an inspection apparatus movably arranged on a robot arm with an illumination unit and a camera unit. The camera unit receives the light of the illumination unit reflected from the surface to be inspected

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS11110611B2Automatic detection and robot-assisted machining of surface defects
Publication Date: 2021.09.07 ATENSOR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY SYSTEM GMBH
  • US11110611B2 patent drawing
  • US11110611B2 patent drawing
  • US11110611B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for automated detection of defects in a workpiece surface and generation of a robot program for the machining of the workpiece is described. In accordance with one embodiment, the method comprises the localization of defects in a surface of a workpiece as well as determining a three-dimensional topography of the localized defects and categorizing at least one localized defect based on its topography. Dependent on the defect category of the at least one defect, a machining process is selected and, in accordance with the selected machining process, a robot program for the robot-assisted machining of the at least one defect is generated with the assistance of a computer.