Surface Density Modification of Porous Phenolic Bodies

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Porous materials used in thermal protection systems, such as phenolic impregnated carbon ablator, face issues like premature failure at interfaces and handling problems due to phenolic shedding, requiring a re-processing technique that does not alter the material composition, allows control over physical and chemical parameters, improves failure strength, and maintains a low density without substantial increase, all within a short time frame.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the application of a phenolic-based liquid solvent mixture to the surface of a porous body, allowing it to diffuse and cure, which increases the surface density of the material without altering its bulk properties, thereby enhancing failure strength and controlling the density profile.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the PICA is bonded to the SIP, then thermal expansion differences are alleviated, but premature failure occurs at the PICA-SIP interface at strengths lower than virgin PICA

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding reliabilityVSAvoidinterface strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies a surface treatment process that modifies only the outer surface region of the PICA material, creating a densified layer with different properties than the bulk material. This local modification improves interface bonding strength without changing the overall material properties, resolving the contradiction between bonding reliability and interface strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the density parameter of the surface region through controlled densification, creating a gradient from the densified surface to the porous bulk. This parameter change in the surface region enhances interface strength while preserving the thermal expansion characteristics of the bulk material, thereby improving bonding reliability without sacrificing interface strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If phenolic is shed as powder or substance at room temperature or above, then handling problems occur, but re-processing the entire material may interfere with or degrade desirable features

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling easeVSAvoidmaterial feature integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies surface treatment only to the outer region of the PICA material where phenolic shedding occurs, rather than re-processing the entire bulk material. This local approach reduces handling problems related to phenolic shedding while preserving the desirable features of the bulk material such as porosity and thermal properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies a controlled amount of densification to the surface region, which is sufficient to reduce phenolic shedding and improve handling ease, but limited enough to avoid degrading the desirable features of the bulk material. This partial action resolves the contradiction between handling ease and material feature integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Strength

If surface density is increased to improve interface strength, then failure strength improves, but overall density increases substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure strengthVSAvoidmaterial density
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent increases density only in the surface region of the PICA material, creating a densified layer with improved mechanical properties for better interface bonding. The bulk material retains its original low density, thereby improving failure strength without substantial increase in overall material density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies densification to only a portion of the material (the surface region) rather than the entire bulk. This partial densification achieves the necessary improvement in failure strength while minimizing the overall density increase, resolving the contradiction between strength improvement and weight control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Strength

If re-processing is applied to modify surface density, then failure strength and failure location improve, but re-processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure strengthVSAvoidre-processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the densification process parameters (temperature, pressure, time) to achieve the desired surface density modification and improved failure strength within a reasonable time frame. By carefully controlling these parameters, the patent balances the trade-off between achieving sufficient strength improvement and minimizing re-processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method effectively increases the failure strength of the material to match virgin PICA levels, reduces premature failure at interfaces, and maintains a low overall density, while ensuring the material's desirable features are preserved, with improved handling and thermal performance.

Implementation Method 1

The selected liquid is allowed to diffuse into the PPB body, to a depth hd of the order of 1-20 mm, or greater if desired, relying in part on an open cell structure of the PPB material and upon a pressure-driven or temperature-driven or vacuum-driven transport mechanism

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Implementation Method 2

The surface-coated PPB body is then allowed to dry and to shed excess solvent for a drying time interval Δt3=6-48 hours, or longer if desired

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 3

The surface-coated and dried PPB body is temperature cured at a curing temperature, T4=60-90° C., for a curing time interval Δt4=6-24 hours, and (optionally) at a supplemental curing temperature, T5=100-150° C., for a supplemental curing time interval Δt5=4-12 hours

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCuring: Heat Treatment

Data Source

PatentUS9440752B1Modification of surface density of a porous medium
Publication Date: 2016.09.13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE ADMINISTRATOR NAT AERONAUTICS & SPACE ADMINISTRATION
  • US9440752B1 patent drawing
  • US9440752B1 patent drawing
  • US9440752B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for increasing density of a region of a porous, phenolic bonded (“PPB”) body adjacent to a selected surface to increase failure tensile strength of the adjacent region and/or to decrease surface recession at elevated temperatures. When the surface-densified PPB body is brought together with a substrate, having a higher failure tensile strength, to form a composite body with a PPB body/substrate interface, the location of tensile failure is moved to a location spaced apart from the interface, the failure tensile strength of the PPB body is increased, and surface recession of the material at elevated temperature is reduced. The method deposits and allows diffusion of a phenolic substance on the selected surface. The PPB body and the substrate may be heated and brought together to form the composite body. The phenolic substance is allowed to diffuse into the PPB body, to volatilize and to cure, to provide a processed body with an increased surface density.