3D Printed Surface Dithering for Staircasing Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Three-dimensional printing technologies face challenges in reproducing the shape and appearance of objects accurately, leading to staircasing artifacts and material thickening issues, which affect the durability and visual quality of printed objects.

Innovation Solution

A method involving surface dithering and erosion steps in the 3D printing process, where a spatially high-frequent dithering signal modifies the surface of the printing object to reduce quantization errors and a voxel-specific distance information is used to classify voxels, resulting in a smoother surface without manual post-processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If voxel-based 3D printing is used to reproduce object shapes, then manufacturing efficiency is improved, but staircasing artifacts appear on surfaces due to quantization errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidsurface accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies surface dithering as a preliminary computational step before printing. By modifying the surface geometry in advance using high-frequency dithering signals, the method prepares the voxel data to compensate for expected quantization errors, thereby reducing staircasing artifacts in the final printed object without sacrificing printing efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the surface representation by applying dithering signals that modify voxel classification criteria. This parameter change in the surface description allows the printing system to achieve smoother surfaces while maintaining the same voxel-based manufacturing process and efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If material is deposited to ensure structural integrity with overlap between voxels, then strength is improved, but material cross-contamination causes thickening perpendicular to the vertical axis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoiddimensional accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies erosion selectively to surface voxels rather than uniformly to the entire object. By identifying and eroding only the affected surface regions where material cross-contamination occurs, the method removes excessive material thickness while preserving the structural integrity of the bulk material and internal features

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If support material is used to enable printing of complex geometries, then adaptability is improved, but build and support material mixing occurs at vertical surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting capabilityVSAvoidsurface quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes support material from the printed object after the printing process is complete. By separating the support material removal as a distinct post-processing step, the method allows complex geometries to be printed with support structures while enabling their complete removal to achieve clean surfaces without material mixing artifacts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Manufacturing precision

If mechanical post-processing such as sanding or polishing is applied to remove staircasing artifacts, then surface smoothness is improved, but manufacturing cost and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface smoothnessVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical post-processing operations with a computational dithering approach applied during the digital model preparation stage. By using algorithms to modify surface voxel classification before printing, the method achieves smooth surfaces without requiring subsequent mechanical sanding or polishing, thereby eliminating associated costs and time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20220373993A1Three-Dimensional Printing with Surface Dithering
Publication Date: 2022.11.24 FRAUNHOFER GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FORDERUNG DER ANGEWANDTEN FORSCHUNG EV
  • US20220373993A1 patent drawing
  • US20220373993A1 patent drawing
  • US20220373993A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for three-dimensional printing includes dithering a set surface of the printing object and printing the printing object with the dithered surface. The dithering includes determining the set surface of the printing object, providing a spatially high-frequent dithering signal, and modifying the set surface as a function of the dithering signal. A non-transitory computer-readable medium includes instructions that implement the method. A 3D printing device includes a printing device and a control unit configured to control the printing device using the method.