Product Authenticity Verification Using Digitized Surface Fingerprint and Blockchain

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for certifying product authenticity, such as using infrared/ultraviolet patterns, NFC chips, and RFID tags, are unreliable due to ease of copying and duplication, leading to potential misuse in verifying genuine products, and require precise imaging equipment which is not universally accessible or practical.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilizes digitized surface fingerprint information and blockchain to package unique product features, allowing for automatic selection of certification regions from product images, extraction of surface fingerprint data, and comparison with stored information to verify authenticity, even with low-precision cameras and without precise distance measurement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional certification marks (infrared/ultraviolet patterns, NFC chips, RFID tags, serial numbers, bar codes) are used to guarantee product authenticity, then product verification can be performed, but these marks can be easily copied or duplicated, compromising reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct authenticity verification reliabilityVSAvoidcopying and duplication of certification marks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the product surface into multiple certification regions and extracts multiple feature points within each region. Instead of relying on a single certification mark, the system segments the verification process into multiple independent feature points (e.g., 5-10 points per region, 2-5 regions per product), making complete copying significantly more difficult while maintaining verification reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different verification strategies to different parts of the product surface. Each certification region contains multiple feature points with unique spatial relationships, and the system selectively verifies specific regions based on product type and certification level. This local differentiation ensures that even if some regions are copied, the unique local features remain unverifiable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If precise imaging equipment is used to capture product features for authenticity verification, then measurement precision is improved, but the complexity and accessibility of the verification system deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface feature measurement precisionVSAvoidimaging equipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic adaptation of verification parameters based on the captured image quality. The system automatically adjusts the number of feature points to extract, the size of certification regions, and the strictness of verification thresholds based on the actual imaging conditions. This allows standard cameras to achieve sufficient precision by dynamically optimizing verification parameters rather than relying on fixed high-precision equipment requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes verification parameters (number of feature points, region size, distance thresholds) based on image quality and product characteristics. Instead of requiring constant high-precision imaging equipment, the patent adjusts parameters to maintain adequate verification accuracy across different camera qualities, making the system accessible to consumers with standard mobile phone cameras.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If product images are used to verify authenticity, then verification convenience is improved, but image distortion due to shooting angle and environment compromises consistency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification convenienceVSAvoidimage consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent deliberately uses asymmetric spatial relationships between multiple feature points within certification regions rather than symmetric patterns. The asymmetric arrangement of feature points creates unique geometric signatures that are invariant to rotation and scaling, allowing the system to distinguish genuine products from distorted images while maintaining verification convenience with standard camera angles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from two-dimensional image pattern matching to three-dimensional spatial relationship verification. By extracting and comparing the spatial coordinates and relative distances between multiple feature points in 3D space (even from 2D images), the system achieves distortion invariance. The verification relies on the consistent spatial relationships between feature points rather than absolute image positions, making it robust to shooting angle and environmental variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20210142336A1Method and system for certifying product authenticity using physical feature information including digitized surface fingerprint and blockchain
Publication Date: 2021.05.13 SUK INSOO
  • US20210142336A1 patent drawing
  • US20210142336A1 patent drawing
  • US20210142336A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a method and system for certifying product authenticity using physical feature information including digitized surface fingerprint and blockchain, each of which manages certification information, packaged by binding together unique product information and physical feature information including surface feature of a product as a unique product feature, based on a distributed ledger of a blockchain to reliably determine whether the product is authentic or not in various ways. The authenticity certification information is packaged as a unique product feature by binding a serial number of the product for which the certification information is generated, together with physical feature information of the product, including image-based surface fingerprint. The authenticity certification information is stored in the blockchain. Determination on authenticity is made by comparing the identification information and the physical feature information with the authenticity certification information stored in the blockchain.