Surface Markers for Automatic Image Capture in Wearable Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wearable computing devices, such as smart glasses, require users to actively initiate image capture, leading to missed opportunities for capturing valuable images, as they lack automatic image capture capabilities triggered by environmental cues.

Innovation Solution

Integration of surface markers that provide detectable signals to wearable devices, allowing for automatic image capture of specified areas without user intervention, using visual, acoustic, or RF signals to instruct the camera to capture images and apply machine-learning filters for content processing and privacy control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If automatic image capture is implemented using surface markers and detectable signals, then the ability to capture valuable moments without user action is improved, but the device complexity increases due to integration of markers and signal processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic image captureVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Surface markers serve as intermediaries between the environment and the wearable device. These markers contain detectable signals (visual, acoustic, or RF) that automatically trigger image capture without requiring user action. The markers mediate the interaction by encoding capture instructions that the wearable device's processor can detect and execute, thereby automating the capture process while keeping the wearable device itself relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

Surface markers are pre-prepared with embedded detectable signals and capture instructions before being placed in the environment. When a wearable device encounters these pre-prepared markers, the capture action is automatically triggered based on the pre-encoded instructions. This preliminary preparation of markers with signals resolves the contradiction by shifting complexity from the wearable device to the stationary markers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If machine-learning filters are applied for content processing and privacy control, then privacy protection is improved by preventing storage of human faces, but the image processing time and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protectionVSAvoidimage processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Machine-learning filters process captured images in real-time to detect and identify content such as human faces. The system provides feedback by automatically determining whether to capture, blur, or exclude certain content based on the analysis. This feedback mechanism enables privacy protection by preventing storage of identifiable information while allowing the system to quickly make decisions about image processing through trained models that have already learned recognition patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Manual review and manual privacy control are replaced with automated machine-learning-based content processing. The machine-learning filters automatically analyze image content, identify sensitive elements like human faces, and apply appropriate privacy protections without requiring user intervention. This substitution reduces processing time compared to manual review while maintaining strong privacy protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If multiple signal types (visual, acoustic, RF) are used for surface markers, then the reliability of automatic capture triggering is improved, but the manufacturing complexity and cost of markers increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapture triggering reliabilityVSAvoidmarker manufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Surface markers are designed with multi-functionality by incorporating multiple types of detectable signals (visual, acoustic, and/or RF) into a single marker. This universal approach allows one marker to serve multiple purposes and be detectable through different modalities, improving reliability of capture triggering. The marker can be manufactured as an integrated component or assembly that combines multiple signal types, making the added complexity manageable while achieving robust automatic capture triggering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12073640B2Systems, devices, and/or processes for dynamic surface marking
Publication Date: 2024.08.27 ARM LTD
  • US12073640B2 patent drawing
  • US12073640B2 patent drawing
  • US12073640B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Subject matter disclosed herein relates to systems, devices, and/or processes for processing signals relating to surfaces that may be viewable by subjects though one or more devices. In an embodiment, a surface may include one or more devices embedded therein to provide one or more signals to define a portion of the surface.