Substrate Surface Micro-Texturing via Printed Maskant Etching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for manufacturing microstructures on aerodynamic surfaces, such as Riblet textures, are slow, costly, and lack durability, making large-scale production economically unviable due to challenges in precise positioning and bonding of small-scale structures.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the controlled deposition of a masking material onto a substrate, followed by selective removal of material using a subtractive agent, allowing for the creation of precise micro-textures through a patterned application of a maskant and etchant, facilitated by an inkjet printer system with real-time control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional machining or grinding methods are used to manufacture microstructures, then manufacturing precision can be achieved, but productivity is slow and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicrostructure precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical machining or grinding methods with a chemical etching process. A maskant material is printed onto the substrate surface to define the microstructure pattern, then a chemical etchant is applied to remove material from exposed areas, forming the desired microstructures. This chemical substitution enables faster processing while maintaining precision through the maskant pattern definition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The maskant material is applied to the substrate surface before the etching process to pre-defin e the microstructure pattern. This preliminary masking action protects areas that should not be etched while exposing areas that need material removal, enabling precise microstructure formation without requiring complex mechanical tooling during the actual manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of manufacture

If plastic films with riblets are molded and applied to aerodynamic surfaces, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to degradation under atmospheric conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoiddurability under atmospheric conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the microstructure formation process from separate plastic film application and integrates it directly into the substrate surface. Instead of molding riblets in thin plastic sheets and bonding them to the aerodynamic surface, the microstructures are formed directly on the substrate through maskant printing and chemical etching. This eliminates the plastic film layer and its associated bonding and degradation problems while maintaining the drag-reducing microstructure functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Manufacturing precision

If precise positioning and bonding of plastic films are performed over large areas, then manufacturing precision is improved, but loss of time increases due to difficulty and time-consuming processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning precisionVSAvoidbonding time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical processes of precise positioning and bonding of plastic films with a direct chemical etching process. The maskant material is printed directly onto the substrate surface in the desired microstructure pattern, eliminating the need for separate positioning and bonding operations. The chemical etchant then directly forms the microstructures on the substrate, significantly reducing the time required while maintaining precision through the printed maskant pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the cost-effective and durable production of micro-textured surfaces suitable for large-scale implementation, improving aerodynamic properties by reducing skin friction and enhancing lift.

Implementation Method 1

forming a micro-texture on the substrate surface by removing material from the exposed surface zones

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical etching: Ablation

Data Source

PatentUS11136673B2Method of surface micro-texturing with a subtractive agent
Publication Date: 2021.10.05 THE BOEING CO
  • US11136673B2 patent drawing
  • US11136673B2 patent drawing
  • US11136673B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of micro-texturing a substrate surface is disclosed, including printing a maskant on the substrate surface to define exposed surface zones on the substrate surface. The method further includes forming a micro-texture on the substrate surface by removing material from the exposed surface zones, and removing the maskant from the substrate surface.