In Situ Surface Modification for Additive Manufacturing Defects

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Additive manufacturing processes often result in defects within parts or coatings that are difficult to correct in situ, leading to compromised performance and mechanical properties, especially before post-processing mitigation can be applied, and existing methods lack effective means for real-time surface modification during layer-wise manufacturing or coating processes.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing a combination of optical beam generators and optically addressable components, such as light valves and electric field modulators, to dynamically correct surface defects by heating and shaping materials in a flowable state, allowing for real-time in situ modification of surface characteristics and topology.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If additive manufacturing is used to build parts layer-by-layer, then manufacturing complexity and design flexibility are improved, but defects such as voids, cracks, and surface irregularities are introduced that compromise part quality and mechanical properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign flexibilityVSAvoidpart quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables the part to self-correct its own defects during the manufacturing process. The optical beams heat and reshape material in situ to repair defects like voids and surface irregularities, allowing the part to self-heal without external intervention or post-processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Traditional mechanical post-processing methods (machining, polishing, heat treatment) are replaced with an optical-based system. Optical beams deliver energy to heat and reshape material, substituting mechanical correction processes with non-contact optical fields for defect mitigation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If post-processing is applied to remove residual stress and defects, then part reliability is improved, but the part is vulnerable to cracking and damage during handling before post-processing is applied

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart reliabilityVSAvoidcrack susceptibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs defect correction and stress mitigation actions during the manufacturing process itself, before the part is completed and subjected to handling. By addressing defects in situ while the part is being built, the part achieves improved reliability and reduced crack susceptibility before it leaves the manufacturing system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The optical beam system acts as an intermediary between the building process and the final part quality. It provides real-time defect mitigation and stress relief during manufacturing, serving as a bridge that improves part reliability before the part undergoes any handling or subsequent operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If real-time surface modification is performed during additive manufacturing, then surface quality and defect correction are improved, but system complexity and process control difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The optical beam system performs multiple functions: it heats material for reshaping, removes defects, planarizes surfaces, and mitigates residual stress. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise require separate systems into a single integrated platform, managing complexity through functional consolidation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system controls surface modification by adjusting optical beam parameters (energy, duration, positioning) rather than changing physical system architecture. By using parameter control to achieve different surface modification outcomes, the system maintains flexibility while managing complexity through software-based control rather than hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Loss of time

If defects are corrected in situ during manufacturing, then loss of time for post-processing is reduced, but the ability to access and correct defects depends on process control capability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepost-processing timeVSAvoidprocess control capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuous operation during additive manufacturing by integrating defect correction into the building process itself. Rather than stopping to post-process or requiring separate correction steps, the optical system continuously monitors and corrects defects in real-time, eliminating idle time and maintaining productive action throughout manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables effective in situ correction of surface defects, improvement of part quality, and mitigation of residual stress and microstructural issues, enhancing the performance and reliability of additively manufactured parts and coatings by allowing for real-time surface shaping and defect removal.

Implementation Method 1

The third beam may act on a surface of a material to heat a portion of the surface of the material into a flowable state

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical heating: Laser

Implementation Method 2

The second beam may be used to control an optically addressable electric field modulator (OAEFM), where the OAEFM is controlled to generate an electric field in a vicinity of the surface and to influence a movement of the portion of material while the portion of material is in the flowable state

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric field: Electric Field

Data Source

PatentUS11198196B2System and method for modifying material surface
Publication Date: 2021.12.14 LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NAT SECURITY LLC
  • US11198196B2 patent drawing
  • US11198196B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a method of modifying a surface of a material, in situ, while the material is being used to at least one of form or modify a portion of a part to remove flaws layer-by-layer and improve a part from a layerwise built, or a coating. The method may involve generating first, second and third beams. The third beam may act on a surface of a material to heat a portion of the surface of the material into a flowable state to thus modify a surface characteristic of the material. The first beam may control an optically addressable light valve (OALV) which modifies an energy of the third beam. The second beam may control an optically addressable electric field modulator (OAEFM) to generate an electric field in a vicinity of the surface and to influence a movement of the portion of material while the portion of material is in the flowable state. The beams are modulated based on a sensing element feedback loop.