Automated Surface Treatment System for 3D Printing Adhesion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Direct-to-object printers face challenges in achieving durable ink adhesion on various materials due to differing surface energies, requiring manual and variable surface treatments that are time-consuming and expose workers to chemicals.

Innovation Solution

An automated surface treatment system with multiple devices for flame, chemical, and plasma treatments, controlled by a central system to raise surface energies of objects immediately before printing, ensuring consistent and efficient ink adhesion across diverse materials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual surface treatment is used, then flexibility in treatment selection is maintained, but human variability and chemical exposure increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in treatment selectionVSAvoidhuman variability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows the object itself to indicate its material type through RFID tags or barcodes, automatically selecting the appropriate surface treatment protocol without human intervention. The controller reads the object identifier and autonomously configures the treatment parameters, eliminating human variability while maintaining flexibility through database-stored material-specific protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates sensors that monitor surface treatment parameters in real-time and provide feedback to the controller. This closed-loop control ensures consistent treatment application across different objects and operators, eliminating human variability while maintaining the ability to adjust protocols based on measured surface energy changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple surface treatment devices are used, then compatibility with diverse materials is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with diverse materialsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs multiple surface treatment devices (flame, chemical, plasma) that can each handle various material types, making the overall system universal rather than requiring specialized equipment for each material. The controller orchestrates these multi-functional devices to achieve material-specific treatments, reducing the need for additional specialized equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The surface treatment system is divided into separate modular devices (flame treatment device, chemical treatment device, plasma treatment device), each capable of independent operation. This segmentation allows the system to handle diverse materials using only the necessary treatment type, reducing operational complexity while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If automated surface treatment is implemented, then productivity increases, but initial system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting throughputVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs surface treatment immediately before printing without requiring separate manual preparation steps. Objects are automatically conveyed through the treatment devices and directly to the printer, eliminating idle time and ensuring surface energy is optimized at the moment of printing, thereby increasing productivity despite automation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The surface treatment system is integrated with the printing system into a single automated workflow. The controller combines object identification, surface treatment selection, treatment execution, and printing into one coordinated process, reducing the need for separate manual operations and increasing overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If aggressive surface treatment is applied, then ink adhesion is improved, but treatment duration decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveink adhesionVSAvoidtreatment duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts treatment parameters (flame temperature, chemical concentration, plasma power) based on the identified object material and desired ink adhesion requirements. By optimizing these parameters for each specific material, the system achieves reliable ink adhesion with minimal treatment duration, avoiding both under-treatment and excessive treatment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies surface treatment only to the extent necessary for achieving adequate ink adhesion on each specific material. Rather than applying uniform aggressive treatment to all objects, the controller monitors treatment effectiveness and stops when sufficient surface energy is achieved, minimizing treatment duration while ensuring reliable adhesion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system automates surface treatment, reducing human variability and chemical exposure, enabling immediate and effective ink adhesion on a wide range of materials, enhancing printing quality and operational efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

a flame surface treatment device (156) that applies a flame surface treatment to the object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 2

a gas plasma surface treatment device (164) that applies a gas plasma surface treatment to the object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma: Plasma

Data Source

PatentUS10016997B1Printer for providing multiple surface treatments to three-dimensional objects prior to printing and method for operating the printer
Publication Date: 2018.07.10 GENESEE VALLEY INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US10016997B1 patent drawing
  • US10016997B1 patent drawing
  • US10016997B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A printer is configured with a surface treatment system having a holder configured to secure an object within the holder and a plurality of surface treatment devices. Each surface treatment device is configured to treat a surface of the object within the holder differently than each of the other surface treatment devices in the plurality of surface treatment devices. Thus, the printer is capable of treating a wide range of materials for printing by the direct-to-object printer.