Surfactant-Mediated Graphene Oxide Reduction for High Purity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing high-quality graphene are limited by the difficulty in achieving large-scale synthesis, the hydrophobicity of graphene nanosheets, and the challenge of removing surfactants from graphene-dispersed solutions, which hinders the versatile applicability of graphene in devices.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the formation of a graphene oxide-dispersed solution with a surfactant containing at least two aromatic functional groups, followed by reduction and washing to produce multi-layered reduced graphene oxide with a high C/O ratio and specific interlayer distance, allowing for the removal of the surfactant without affecting the graphene characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a surfactant is used to stabilize graphene nanosheets in a dispersed solution, then the dispersibility and stability of graphene are improved, but the difficulty of removing the surfactant increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability of graphene-dispersed solutionVSAvoiddifficulty of removing surfactant
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of the surfactant by selecting compounds with specific aromatic functional groups (naphthyl, anthracenyl, pyrenyl, or tetrahydropyrenyl) that exhibit weak π-π interaction with graphene. This parameter change allows the surfactant to provide stabilization while enabling easy removal through washing with water or organic solvents, resolving the contradiction between stability and ease of removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses aromatic surfactants as intermediary substances that temporarily stabilize graphene nanosheets during processing. These surfactants act as mediators that can be easily introduced and removed, allowing the graphene to maintain stability during synthesis and processing while enabling subsequent purification to produce high-purity graphene products.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If mechanical exfoliation is used to produce pure graphene sheets, then the purity and quality of graphene are improved, but the productivity and scalability are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurity of graphene sheetsVSAvoidmass production capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical exfoliation method with a chemical synthesis approach using aromatic surfactants. This substitution enables scalable chemical synthesis of high-quality graphene sheets while maintaining purity, resolving the contradiction between manufacturing precision and productivity by moving from a mechanically-intensive process to a chemically-driven process that is more amenable to mass production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the production methodology from mechanical to chemical synthesis, utilizing aromatic surfactants with specific molecular structures to control graphene formation. This parameter change in the synthesis approach enables both high purity and scalable production, overcoming the limitations of mechanical exfoliation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If conventional functionalization methods are used without surfactants, then the purity of graphene is maintained, but the dispersibility and self-assembly characteristics are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurity of grapheneVSAvoiddispersibility and self-assembly characteristics
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces aromatic functional groups as a new parameter for graphene functionalization, utilizing π-π interactions between aromatic molecules and graphene sheets. This parameter change enables simultaneous improvement of dispersibility and self-assembly characteristics while maintaining high purity through easy surfactant removal, overcoming the limitations of conventional functionalization methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs aromatic surfactants as intermediary functionalization agents that temporarily modify graphene surfaces to improve dispersibility and self-assembly. These intermediaries can be easily removed after serving their function, leaving high-purity graphene with enhanced adaptability for various applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If thermal expansion method is used to functionalize graphene oxide, then the solution processability is improved, but the application scope is restricted due to purity requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution processabilityVSAvoidapplication scope
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the functionalization approach from thermal expansion to aromatic surfactant-mediated functionalization. This parameter change enables solution processability while avoiding the purity restrictions of thermal methods, as the aromatic surfactants can be easily removed by washing, thereby expanding the application scope to include high-purity requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses aromatic surfactants as intermediary agents that provide solution processability during processing and can be easily removed to achieve high purity. This intermediary approach overcomes the restriction of thermal expansion methods, enabling both good solution processability and high purity for versatile applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables the production of high-quality, surfactant-free reduced graphene oxide with improved dispersibility and self-assembly characteristics, suitable for various applications, including flexible electrodes and biosensors.

Implementation Method 1

there has been no report on non-shared functionalization of the graphene sheet through π-π interaction using aromatic organic molecules

Methodology Applied
Scientific Effectπ-π interaction:

Implementation Method 2

reducing the graphene oxide-dispersed solution to obtain a layered structure of reduced graphene oxide

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction: Reduction

Data Source

PatentUS9388049B2Method of producing graphene using surfactant
Publication Date: 2016.07.12 RES & BUSINESS FOUND SUNGKYUNKWAN UNIV
  • US9388049B2 patent drawing
  • US9388049B2 patent drawing
  • US9388049B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of producing reduced graphene oxide and reduce graphene oxide produced by the method are provided. The method of producing reduced graphene oxide involves forming a graphene oxide-dispersed solution comprising graphene oxide and a surfactant that comprises at least two aromatic functional groups, reducing the graphene oxide-dispersed solution to obtain a layered structure of reduced graphene oxide comprising the at least two aromatic functional groups, and dispersing the layered structure of reduced graphene oxide in a solvent to produce a multi-layered reduced graphene oxide.