3D Printed Skeleton Surfboard Manufacturing Process

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Surfboards are toxic, fragile, and lose performance over time due to their conventional polyurethane foam and polyester resin composition, posing environmental and practical issues.

Innovation Solution

A modular manufacturing process involving digital modeling, 3D printing of a hollow internal skeleton, and vacuum-bonded composite sheets to create a lightweight, durable, and eco-friendly surfboard with customizable geometry and material distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional polyurethane foam and polyester resin are used for surfboard construction, then ease of manufacture and initial performance are achieved, but environmental toxicity and performance degradation over time occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance durabilityVSAvoidenvironmental toxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameters from conventional polyurethane foam and polyester resin to alternative materials such as bio-based foams, epoxy resins, and natural fibers. This substitution maintains the structural functionality while eliminating toxic substances, thereby resolving the contradiction between reliability and environmental harm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs composite material structures combining multiple layers of foam cores, resin systems, and fiber reinforcements. This composite approach allows optimization of both mechanical performance durability and environmental compatibility by selecting non-toxic materials that work synergistically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional foam blocks are used for surfboard construction, then ease of shaping is achieved, but material waste and environmental impact increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshaping easeVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses pre-formed foam blocks with optimized density distributions and pre-cut shapes that reduce the need for extensive material removal during shaping. This preliminary preparation maintains ease of manufacture while minimizing waste generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention implements material recovery processes where off-cuts and waste materials from shaping operations are collected, recycled, or repurposed. This approach reduces overall material waste while maintaining the ease of manual shaping process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple middlemen are involved in the surfboard value chain, then distribution reach is improved, but carbon footprint and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistribution reachVSAvoidcarbon footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the value chain into modular components: local shaping workshops produce boards, regional distribution hubs consolidate shipments, and direct-to-consumer digital platforms handle sales. This segmentation reduces the number of intermediate handlers and optimizes each segment's efficiency, lowering overall carbon footprint while maintaining distribution reach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces a digital platform as a virtual intermediary that connects manufacturers directly with consumers, eliminating the need for physical intermediaries. This digital mediator maintains market reach while significantly reducing the carbon footprint associated with traditional multi-layer distribution networks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process results in a surfboard that is durable, adaptable to various user needs, environmentally responsible, and maintains performance, while reducing material waste and carbon footprint.

Implementation Method 1

producing a hollow internal skeleton by additive manufacturing/3D printing of a multitude of plastic wires that are locally connected to one another

Methodology Applied
Scientific Effect3D Printing: 3D Printing

Implementation Method 2

placing the result under vacuum and bonding at least one composite sheet made of fiber and resin around the skeleton

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Data Source

PatentUS20240190538A1Process for manufacturing a rigid aquatic floating object such as a surfboard
Publication Date: 2024.06.13 HEXA
  • US20240190538A1 patent drawing
  • US20240190538A1 patent drawing
  • US20240190538A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A process for manufacturing a rigid aquatic floating object including an elongate three-dimensional external profile having in total a main length extending from its nose to its tail, a thickness, a width, a deck and an underside. The process includes a) digitally modelling the floating object to be manufactured, b) producing a hollow and apertured internal skeleton by additive manufacturing/3D printing of a multitude of plastic wires that are locally connected to one another geometrically and that reproduce a three-dimensional mesh obtained in a), c) placing the result under vacuum and bonding at least one composite sheet made of fibre and resin around the skeleton forming a shell, d) applying successive fibre-and-resin layers so as to reinforce, via stratification, the shell of step c), and e) finishing the external surface of the stratified sheets made of fibre-and-resin composite by sanding to obtain the final shape of the floating object.