Surgical System Abnormality Detection and Control Mode Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current surgical systems lack an automated mechanism to quickly respond to abnormalities in the imaging system, leading to potential delays in handling issues such as abnormal image display, which can compromise surgical precision and safety.

Innovation Solution

A surgical system equipped with an imaging system that determines abnormal states and switches to an abnormality-handling mode, executing predefined processing to address visual field abnormalities, including stopping slave arms and alerting operators, thereby ensuring timely intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If manual monitoring and response to imaging system abnormalities is used, then system complexity is reduced, but response time to abnormalities increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse time to abnormalityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-defines multiple abnormality-handling modes (first mode through fourth mode) that are prepared in advance for different types of imaging abnormalities. When an abnormality is detected, the appropriate pre-defined mode is automatically activated, eliminating the need for manual assessment and response planning. This preliminary preparation of handling strategies significantly reduces response time while maintaining manageable system complexity through structured mode definitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The determination unit continuously monitors image information and provides feedback to the control unit about abnormal states. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables automatic detection and triggering of appropriate abnormality-handling modes. The system establishes a feedback cycle where image quality assessment results directly control system response actions, reducing reliance on manual monitoring while implementing an automated surveillance system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If automated abnormality detection and response is implemented, then response speed improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabnormality handling efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The abnormality handling system is segmented into distinct operational modes (first mode, second mode, third mode, fourth mode), each designed for specific types of imaging abnormalities. This segmentation allows the complex task of abnormality management to be divided into manageable, specialized sub-functions. Each mode handles specific scenarios independently, improving overall handling efficiency while keeping individual mode complexities low and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters based on the type of abnormality detected. Different abnormality-handling modes correspond to different parameter configurations (e.g., stopping slave arms, changing control modes, alerting operators). By parameterizing the response based on abnormality type rather than implementing completely different systems for each scenario, the patent achieves high handling efficiency while controlling system complexity through parameter-based adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If comprehensive abnormality monitoring is implemented, then surgical safety improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical safetyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple abnormality-handling modes are defined in advance, each prepared for specific types of imaging abnormalities. This preliminary configuration of safety responses ensures that appropriate safety actions are ready to be executed immediately when abnormalities occur, enhancing surgical safety without requiring complex real-time decision-making systems. The safety mechanisms are pre-configured based on anticipated abnormality scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the system receive different types of control based on the specific abnormality detected. For example, some modes stop slave arms completely, while others merely alert operators or change control parameters. This localized, targeted response to specific abnormality types provides comprehensive safety coverage while avoiding unnecessary complexity in the overall monitoring system. Each monitoring and response component is optimized for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9585724B2Surgical system
Publication Date: 2017.03.07 OLYMPUS CORPORATION(JP)
  • US9585724B2 patent drawing
  • US9585724B2 patent drawing
  • US9585724B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one embodiment, a surgical system includes an imaging system, a determination unit, and a control unit. The imaging system is configured to acquire image information. The determination unit is configured to determine, based on the image information, whether an abnormal state has occurred in the surgical system. The control unit is configured to switch to an abnormality time control mode of executing abnormality-handling processing, when the determination unit determines that an abnormal state has occurred.