Surgical Instrument Access Verification to Block Unauthorized Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge of ensuring appropriate access control and preventing inadvertent activation of surgical instruments by healthcare professionals during surgical procedures, which can lead to surgical site infections and inefficiencies, is not adequately addressed by existing systems.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that identifies surgical instruments and detects control inputs by healthcare professionals, determining their access control levels and authorizing or blocking their control inputs based on these levels, with adjustments made based on proximity, surgical steps, instrument energized states, and biomarker measurements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If access control verification is implemented for surgical instruments, then surgical safety is improved by preventing inadvertent activation, but device complexity increases due to access control level determination and verification mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical safetyVSAvoidaccess control verification system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary access control verification mechanism that mediates between the healthcare professional and the surgical instrument. The processor acts as an intermediary, receiving control inputs, verifying access control levels, and only allowing authorized inputs to reach the instrument, thus preventing inadvertent activation while maintaining system reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary access control verification before allowing control inputs to affect the surgical instrument. By determining the healthcare professional's access control level in advance and comparing it against required authorization levels, the system prevents unauthorized or inadvertent activation before it can occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If tiered access control levels are implemented for different control functions, then surgical safety is improved by restricting critical functions, but ease of operation decreases due to multiple access level requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical safetyVSAvoidinstrument control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by implementing different access control requirements for different functions of the surgical instrument. Critical functions such as activation and energy level adjustment require higher access control levels, while less critical functions have lower requirements, allowing appropriate restriction without unnecessarily complicating overall operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If real-time access control verification is performed for each control input, then surgical safety is improved by preventing inadvertent control, but productivity decreases due to verification delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical safetyVSAvoidsurgical procedure efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary access control verification by determining the healthcare professional's access control level in advance and storing this information for quick reference. When control inputs are received, the system compares the input against pre-determined authorization levels rather than performing full verification each time, reducing verification delays while maintaining safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4150630B1Control access verification of a health care professional
Publication Date: 2025.11.12 CILAG GMBH INTERNATIONAL
  • EP4150630B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4150630B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4150630B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A computing system may identify a surgical instrument for a surgical procedure in an operating room (OR). The computing system may detect a control input by a health care professional (HCP) to control the surgical instrument. The computing system may determine the HCP's access control level associated with the surgical instrument. The computing system may determine whether the HCP has an authorization to control the surgical instrument. If the computing system determines that HCP is unauthorized to control the surgical instrument based on the access control level associated with the HCP, the computing system may block the control input by the HCP. If the computing system determines that the HCP is authorized to control the surgical instrument based on the access control level associated with the HCP, the computing system may effectuate the control input by the HCP to control the surgical instrument.