Reorientable Surgical Arm Handle for Safe Retroflection Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current surgical systems lack optimal control elements and methods for ensuring safe and ergonomic retroflection of articulated mechanical arms during gynecological surgery, which can risk tissue damage and complicate surgical procedures.

Innovation Solution

A surgical system comprising an articulated mechanical arm with a surgical end effector and two input devices: a first input device for controlled retroflection of the arm and a second input device with a handle member that can be oriented in various selectable orientations to control the arm segments and joints, allowing for precise displacement and reorientation of the end effector.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single input device is used to control both retroflection and surgical operations, then device complexity is reduced, but control precision and surgeon ergonomics deteriorate during retroflection operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of input devicesVSAvoidergonomic comfort during retroflection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into two distinct input devices: a foot pedal for retroflection control and a hand controller for surgical operations. This segmentation allows each device to be optimized for its specific function, with the foot pedal providing ergonomic control during retroflection without requiring hand manipulation, thereby resolving the contradiction between device simplicity and operational ergonomics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If the handle member is fixed in a single orientation, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to different surgical positions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandle orientation mechanismsVSAvoidadaptability to surgical positions
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The handle member is designed with dynamic reorientation capability, allowing it to be rotated and tilted to match different surgical arm configurations and surgeon positions. This dynamic adjustment enables the control device to adapt to various surgical scenarios while maintaining intuitive control, resolving the contradiction between device simplicity and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If retroflection control requires handle reorientation, then control precision is improved, but operation time and surgeon fatigue increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precision during retroflectionVSAvoidtime for retroflection operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The foot pedal acts as an intermediary control device that enables retroflection without requiring hand manipulation or handle reorientation. By transferring retroflection control from the hand controller to the foot pedal, the system achieves precise retroflection control while eliminating the time-consuming handle reorientation process and reducing surgeon fatigue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If the surgical arm is constrained during retroflection, then tissue damage risk is reduced, but freedom of movement during surgery is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue damage riskVSAvoidfreedom of movement
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements preliminary control measures during retroflection through the foot pedal, which provides controlled, gradual arm movement with built-in safety constraints. This preliminary control prevents excessive or unsafe movements that could cause tissue damage, while the subsequent hand controller provides full freedom of movement for surgical operations once the arm is properly positioned.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS12213758B2Orientation of user-input devices for controlling surgical arms
Publication Date: 2025.02.04 MOMENTIS SURGICAL LTD
  • US12213758B2 patent drawing
  • US12213758B2 patent drawing
  • US12213758B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A surgical system comprises an articulated mechanical arm comprising arm segments connected serially by arm joints that flex and rotate, and first and second input-devices. The second input-device comprises a handle configurable to be oriented in any orientation in an x-y-z space, and the handle comprises segment members and joint members corresponding to the arm segments and arm joints of the arm. The arm joints can be actuatable by, and have the same degrees of freedom as, the handle joint member. A method of using the surgical system includes retroflecting the arm, transitioning control of the arm from the first input device to the second input device, and performing a surgical action, during which a displacement vector or a reorientation arc of the handle member through the x-y-z space is translated to a corresponding displacement vector or corresponding reorientation arc of the end effector in the same x-y-z space.