Multi-stage code scanning for surgical asset tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for tracking surgical supplies during procedures are slow, error-prone, and inefficient due to the challenges of manually recording small, similar, and highly reflective implant items, especially in a sterile environment where direct part marking and reading are difficult.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system where machine-readable objects, such as pegs with embedded data matrix codes, are used to store and read information about surgical assets, allowing for real-time electronic data entry and reducing human error by automatically identifying and storing part numbers, and printing machine-readable labels for verification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If direct part marking using barcodes on implants is used, then tracking accuracy is improved, but implementation difficulty increases due to polished stainless steel surfaces, high reflectivity, small size, and harsh reprocessing environment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking accuracyVSAvoidimplementation difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary system consisting of machine-readable objects (barcodes, data matrices) placed on or near the implants rather than directly on the implant surfaces. This intermediary layer allows optical scanning to function effectively by providing a readable target that is not subject to the same constraints as the implant itself, thereby resolving the contradiction between tracking accuracy and implementation feasibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a copy of the implant identification information in machine-readable form on separate objects (pegs, trays, packaging) that can be easily scanned. Instead of attempting to mark the difficult-to-mark implant directly, the system copies the identification data to accessible surfaces that are optimal for optical scanning, thus achieving accurate tracking without the manufacturing difficulties of direct implant marking

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Device complexity

If manual recording methods are used, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but tracking speed and accuracy deteriorate due to tedium and error-proneness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidtracking speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical recording processes with automated optical scanning and electronic data capture systems. Barcode scanners and data matrix readers automatically capture implant identification information, eliminating the need for manual writing or data entry. This substitution dramatically increases tracking speed and accuracy while maintaining relative system simplicity through the use of standard scanning technology

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service tracking where the scanning process automatically captures and records implant information without requiring manual intervention. The machine-readable objects on pegs and trays automatically provide their identification data when scanned, allowing the system to track supplies autonomously rather than requiring staff to manually record each item

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If machine-readable objects are placed on pegs in surgical trays, then information transfer efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases due to multiple reading stages and label printing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation transfer efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the information transfer process into distinct stages: initial reading from machine-readable objects on pegs, intermediate storage in electronic systems, and verification through optical scanning of printed labels. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized independently and simplifies the overall system by breaking down the complex information transfer task into manageable, standardized operations that can be performed by existing scanning and printing equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11663428B2Multi-stage code scanning for data transfer
Publication Date: 2023.05.30 SUMMATE TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US11663428B2 patent drawing
  • US11663428B2 patent drawing
  • US11663428B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A first signal is ready from a first machine-readable object, which may be part of a peg stored in a surgical asset tray. A first part number of a first surgical asset is identified based on the first signal. A label is printed to include a first machine-readable visual indicia representing the first part number. A second signal is optically read from the first machine-readable visual indicia. The first part number of the first surgical asset is identified based on the second signal. The first part number of the first surgical asset is stored in a non-transitory computer-readable medium. This method enables information about surgical assets used in the field to be transferred from machine-readable objects into electronic data stores efficiently, effectively, and semi-automatically.