Surgical Automation Controller Dynamic Level Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Surgical procedures often face challenges in efficiently automating tasks due to the slow adoption of new technologies in medical facilities, leading to suboptimal use of advanced surgical instruments and systems, and there is a need for adaptive autonomy levels and failure mitigation strategies in surgical devices.

Innovation Solution

A surgical device that can dynamically adjust its automation levels based on real-time data, including user, environmental, and historical data, and switch between different autonomous functions to mitigate failures, while also adapting its control algorithms and interconnecting with various surgical systems for optimized performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If surgical tasks are automated using advanced surgical instruments and systems, then productivity and surgical outcomes are improved, but device complexity and difficulty of implementation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical task efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The surgical automation system is divided into multiple autonomous functions with distinct automation levels (e.g., Level 1: guidance, Level 2: task execution, Level 3: decision-making). Each function can be independently activated or deactivated based on surgical needs, allowing the system to provide automation only where required while maintaining simplicity in other areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the level of automation based on real-time surgical context, performance monitoring, and trigger events. The controller can switch between different autonomous functions and automation levels during a procedure, enabling the system to adapt to changing surgical conditions while optimizing the balance between automation benefits and complexity management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple autonomous functions with different automation levels are implemented, then adaptability to surgical conditions is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomy level flexibilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous functions are segmented into distinct levels (first autonomous function, second autonomous function, etc.) with different degrees of automation. Each function has a specific trigger event and performance monitoring mechanism, allowing the system to manage complexity through modular organization while maintaining high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors performance of autonomous functions using real-time surgical data and compares it against trigger event thresholds. This feedback mechanism enables automatic adjustment of automation levels and switching between functions based on actual surgical performance, reducing the need for complex manual control while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If real-time monitoring and performance comparison are implemented, then reliability and safety are improved, but use of energy and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical task reliabilityVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors performance of autonomous functions by comparing real-time surgical data against pre-established trigger event thresholds and ideal surgical data. This feedback approach enables reliable detection of performance degradation and automatic response to trigger events while using computational resources efficiently by only analyzing data when deviations from expected performance occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20230377709A1Method of controlling autonomous operations in a surgical system
Publication Date: 2023.11.23 CILAG GMBH INTERNATIONAL
  • US20230377709A1 patent drawing
  • US20230377709A1 patent drawing
  • US20230377709A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples described herein may include a surgical computing system that determines an autonomous operation parameter and generates a control signal for an autonomous operation based on the autonomous operation parameter. The surgical computing system may obtain surgical data and determine the autonomous operation parameter based on the surgical data. The surgical computing system may obtain surgical data and determine the autonomous operation parameter based on the surgical data. The surgical computing system may send the control signal for the autonomous operation, for example, to one or more smart surgical devices.