Surgical Clip Spring System for Increased Closing Force

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing surgical clips used for treating aneurysms face challenges such as inefficient manufacturing, potential for over-winding leading to failures, difficulty in adjusting closing force, and obstructed views during application due to wide construction size, with insufficient closing force being a significant concern.

Innovation Solution

The use of an additional spring in conjunction with a main biasing spring to increase closing force without modifying the existing design or material, allowing for adaptive retrofitting and precise force adjustment through the arrangement and configuration of the springs, including yoke, bending beam, or leaf spring types.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If a single main biasing spring is used in existing surgical clips, then the device structure remains simple, but the closing force is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosing forceVSAvoidspring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines a main biasing spring with an additional biasing spring to create a composite spring system. The main spring provides the primary closing force while the additional spring reinforces and supplements this force, particularly in the critical closing phase. This merging of spring functions achieves higher closing force without requiring a complete redesign of the entire clip structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The spring system is segmented into distinct functional components: a main biasing spring that operates throughout the cycle and an additional biasing spring that activates specifically during the closing phase. This segmentation allows each spring to be optimized for its specific function, with the additional spring providing extra force only when needed, thereby avoiding unnecessary complexity during opening and retention phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Force

If the spring is wound more to increase closing force, then the closing force increases, but the risk of over-winding and spring failure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosing forceVSAvoidspring overload risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The spring system is segmented into a main spring and an additional spring, allowing the closing force to be distributed across two separate elastic elements. This segmentation prevents any single spring from being over-wound or overloaded, as each spring operates within a safer force range. The additional spring acts as a backup that activates only when the main spring's force is insufficient, reducing the risk of spring failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The additional biasing spring serves as a preemptive cushioning element that activates before spring failure can occur. By having this extra spring ready to engage, the system prevents excessive force accumulation in any single spring, thereby avoiding over-winding and associated failures before they can happen.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Force

If the clip construction size is increased to provide sufficient closing force, then the closing force increases, but the view during application becomes obstructed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosing forceVSAvoidview accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The spring system is segmented into a main spring and an additional spring, allowing the required closing force to be achieved through combined elastic deformation rather than requiring a larger overall clip structure. This segmentation enables sufficient force generation within a compact design, maintaining good visibility during application while providing the necessary closing force through the coordinated action of two springs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Force

If the spring winding is increased to provide sufficient closing force, then the closing force increases, but the manufacturing efficiency decreases due to complex winding processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosing forceVSAvoidmanufacturing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The spring system is segmented into a main spring and an additional spring, allowing each spring to be manufactured with simpler, more standardized winding processes. Rather than creating one complex, heavily-wound spring, the design uses two moderately-wound springs that can be produced more efficiently. The additional spring can even be a simpler element that reinforces the main spring's action, reducing the overall manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

5Force

If the spring is made more resilient to provide sufficient closing force, then the closing force increases, but the material stress increases leading to potential failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosing forceVSAvoidmaterial stress
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The spring system is segmented into a main spring and an additional spring, distributing the mechanical stress across two separate elastic elements. This segmentation reduces the stress concentration in any single spring, allowing the material to operate within safer stress limits while still achieving the required closing force through the combined action of both springs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The additional biasing spring acts as a stress-distributing element that prevents excessive stress accumulation in the main spring. By having this supplementary spring ready, the system cushions against material failure by spreading the load, thereby reducing peak stress levels that could lead to material fatigue or failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides a surgical clip with enhanced closing force, reduced material stress, and a narrower design, enabling efficient machine manufacturing while allowing for precise force adjustment and minimizing the risk of spring overload, thus improving the effectiveness and usability of the clip.

Implementation Method 1

linked to each other via a connecting piece (spring element) which applies a closing force forcing the two clamping legs/clamping jaws towards each other

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10555739B2Snap link-type surgical clip
Publication Date: 2020.02.11 AESCULAP AG
  • US10555739B2 patent drawing
  • US10555739B2 patent drawing
  • US10555739B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A surgical clip includes a first clamping leg and a second clamping leg, the two clamping legs, when in use, being movable towards each other such that they squeeze a blood vessel shut and are linked to each other via a connecting piece which applies a closing force forcing the two clamping jaws towards each other, with two additional springs being provided in addition to the connecting piece which functions as the main spring and amplifying the closing force, the additional springs being arranged in parallel to the main spring and acting in opposite directions.