Robotic Surgical End Effector Temperature Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robotic surgical systems face challenges in safely managing the temperature of end effectors to prevent inadvertent contact with non-targeted tissue, other instrumentation, or the clinician, particularly during removal and post-removal movements, which can lead to trauma or injury.

Innovation Solution

A control module is programmed with algorithms to monitor the temperature of end effectors and provide feedback to clinicians through visual, auditory, or haptic means, restricting movement or preventing removal if the end effector is above or below a certain threshold, ensuring safe handling and preventing unintended contact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the end effector is allowed to be removed freely from the patient, then the productivity of the surgical procedure is improved, but the risk of injury to non-targeted tissue, instrumentation, or the clinician increases due to high temperature

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremoval efficiencyVSAvoidthermal injury risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control module continuously monitors temperature parameters of the end effector and provides real-time feedback to the clinician through visual, auditory, or haptic signals. When the temperature exceeds a predetermined threshold, the system alerts the clinician and restricts removal movement, enabling safe operation through continuous monitoring and feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the removal characteristics of the end effector based on real-time temperature conditions. When temperature is within safe limits, removal is allowed; when temperature exceeds the threshold, removal is restricted. This dynamic control adapts the system behavior to current thermal states, resolving the contradiction between productivity and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the end effector removal is restricted when temperature is high, then the safety against thermal injury is improved, but the time required for procedure completion increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidprocedure time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides real-time temperature monitoring and feedback to the clinician, enabling informed decisions about when removal is safe. The visual, auditory, or haptic alerts allow the clinician to understand the thermal state and plan removal timing accordingly, minimizing unnecessary delays while ensuring safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary temperature assessment before allowing removal. By monitoring temperature parameters continuously and alerting the clinician in advance when thresholds are approached, the system enables preparatory actions to cool the end effector or adjust positioning, thereby minimizing actual removal delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If real-time temperature monitoring is implemented, then the safety against inadvertent contact is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety monitoringVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control module integrates temperature sensing and feedback mechanisms into the existing robotic surgical system architecture. By utilizing the controller's existing processing capabilities and standard output interfaces for visual, auditory, or haptic feedback, the system achieves real-time monitoring without requiring entirely new complex subsystems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control module performs multiple functions: it monitors temperature parameters, processes thermal data, generates feedback signals through existing output channels, and controls motor functions. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated components, thereby limiting the increase in overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Temperature

If the end effector is kept in position for cooling, then the temperature safety is improved, but the productivity of the surgical procedure decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveend effector temperatureVSAvoidsurgical efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the end effector's position and motor functions based on real-time temperature feedback. When cooling is needed, the system restricts removal movement and may activate cooling mechanisms. When temperature decreases below the threshold, the system automatically restores removal freedom, enabling flexible adaptation between cooling and productivity requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system engages in periodic temperature monitoring and cooling cycles, alternating between periods of restricted movement for cooling and periods of free movement for surgical tasks. This periodic action allows the end effector to be cooled when necessary while maintaining overall surgical productivity through efficient cycling between these states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20250000568A1System and method to avoid contact with hot instrument in robotic surgical system
Publication Date: 2025.01.02 CILAG GMBH INTERNATIONAL
  • US20250000568A1 patent drawing
  • US20250000568A1 patent drawing
  • US20250000568A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes a robotic arm, an instrument, and a control module. The control module is operable to drive movement of the robotic arm to thereby move the instrument relative to the patient. The control module is configured to monitor one or more parameters indicative of a temperature of a portion of the end effector of the instrument; to determine whether the temperature of the portion of the end effector crosses a threshold value, based at least in part on the one or more monitored parameters; and to restrict movement of the end effector in response to determining that the temperature of the portion of the end effector crosses the threshold value. The restricted movement may include removal of the end effector from the patient or movement of the end effector after removal of the end effector from the patient.