Surgical Flow Limiter Managing Pressure Pulses in Aspiration Branch

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In phacoemulsification surgical systems, pressure pulses during particle breakthrough in the aspiration branch can cause damage to the eye, and existing solutions like bypass bores or flow limiters with grooves and recesses fail to effectively manage these pulses, leading to suboptimal suction and pressure drops.

Innovation Solution

A flow limiter with a limiter element featuring a flow channel arrangement of a main channel and a secondary channel opening at an angle of 90° or more, designed to generate turbulent flow and achieve a high pressure loss coefficient, effectively limiting pressure pulses and oscillations during particle breakthroughs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the suction pressure is increased to clear blocked particles in the aspiration branch, then the particle breakthrough is achieved, but a large volume of fluid is briefly suctioned out of the eye causing a strong decrease in intraocular pressure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle breakthroughVSAvoidintraocular pressure decrease
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The flow limiter is installed in advance in the aspiration branch to cushion the harmful pressure pulses before they can reach the eye. The limiter element with its flow channels creates a buffer zone that absorbs and dissipates the shock waves generated during particle breakthrough, preventing the harmful effect of sudden intraocular pressure decrease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The flow limiter acts as an intermediary component between the suction source and the eye. It mediates the interaction by introducing a controlled resistance element that modifies the fluid dynamics, allowing particle breakthrough while preventing excessive pressure pulses from reaching the eye.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a bypass bore is created between irrigation and aspiration branches to prevent pressure pulses, then pressure pulse damage is reduced, but the suction pressure is significantly reduced affecting basic system functionality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure pulse damageVSAvoidsuction pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of creating a bypass connection, the flow limiter segments the main aspiration channel into multiple flow paths through its flow channel arrangement. This segmentation creates turbulence and resistance without providing an alternative bypass route, thereby maintaining suction pressure while reducing pressure pulse amplitude.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The flow limiter changes the flow parameters by introducing controlled resistance and turbulence in the aspiration branch. The limiter element modifies the velocity profile, pressure distribution, and flow pattern to dampen pressure pulses while maintaining adequate suction pressure for effective operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If grooves and recesses are formed on the inner side of the tube-shaped flow limiter to generate turbulent flow, then flow limitation is achieved, but only relatively small pressure loss can be attained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow limitationVSAvoidpressure loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The flow channel arrangement extends into the longitudinal dimension of the flow limiter, creating a three-dimensional flow path with multiple channels that open at angles. This dimensional approach generates more effective turbulence and flow resistance compared to surface-level grooves and recesses, achieving higher pressure loss coefficients while maintaining flow limitation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The flow limiter significantly reduces pressure pulses and oscillations, preventing large volumes from being suctioned out of the eye, thus minimizing the risk of damaging the eye's intraocular pressure and ensuring a more successful cataract operation.

Implementation Method 1

designed to generate turbulent flow and achieve a high pressure loss coefficient, effectively limiting pressure pulses and oscillations during particle breakthroughs

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulent flow: Turbulence

Data Source

PatentUS8303553B2Flow limiter for a fluid flowing in an aspiration branch of a surgical system, and surgical system
Publication Date: 2012.11.06 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC AG
  • US8303553B2 patent drawing
  • US8303553B2 patent drawing
  • US8303553B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a flow limiter for a fluid flowing in an aspiration branch of a surgical system, which fluid is a surgical fluid and has emulsified particles in a surgical intervention, with a limiter element that comprises at least one flow channel arrangement with at least one main channel and at least one subsidiary channel that opens into the main channel at an angle of greater than or equal to 90°. The invention also relates to a surgical system, in particular an ophthalmic microsurgical system for lens surgery.