Surgical Tool Force Limiter Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Minimally invasive surgical instruments often have limited control and range of motion, making it difficult to maneuver through tight spaces and increasing the risk of trauma to surrounding tissues, particularly in procedures like laparoscopy and endoscopy, due to their rigid design and limited articulation.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a force limiter mechanism in surgical tools that limits the actuation force delivered to the end effector, using a superelastic shape memory material spring or tension bearing member to prevent excessive force transmission, allowing for controlled movement and reduced tissue trauma.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional rigid surgical instruments are used, then structural strength is maintained, but control precision and range of motion are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidinstrument rigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the instrument shaft flexible rather than rigid, allowing it to bend and articulate to follow the natural curvature of the gastrointestinal tract. The flexible shaft with articulation joints enables dynamic adaptation to anatomical structures while maintaining control precision through the force limiter mechanism that prevents excessive bending forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Force

If more force is applied to advance the instrument, then penetration capability is improved, but tissue trauma increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuation forceVSAvoidtissue trauma
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The force limiter mechanism serves as a beforehand cushioning element by being pre-configured with a maximum force threshold. When the actuation force reaches this predetermined limit, the force limiter engages to absorb or block additional force, preventing excessive force transmission to the tissue and thereby cushioning against potential trauma before it occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the instrument shaft is made more flexible to improve maneuverability, then range of motion is improved, but structural strength is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverange of motionVSAvoidshaft strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs flexible shells by constructing the shaft from multiple articulated segments or flexible materials that can bend while maintaining structural integrity. The flexible shaft design allows significant range of motion to navigate complex anatomical pathways while the segmented construction and force limiter prevent excessive bending that would compromise structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances the control and range of motion of surgical instruments by limiting the force applied to tissues, reducing the risk of trauma and improving precision during minimally invasive procedures, thereby reducing operative time and improving surgical outcomes.

Implementation Method 1

using a superelastic shape memory material spring or tension bearing member to prevent excessive force transmission

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuperelasticity: Pseudoelasticity

Data Source

PatentUS8728118B2Tool with end effector force limiter
Publication Date: 2014.05.20 INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS INC
  • US8728118B2 patent drawing
  • US8728118B2 patent drawing
  • US8728118B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention provides surgical or diagnostic tools and associated methods that offer improved user control for operating remotely within regions of the body. In some embodiments these tools include a proximally-located actuator for the operation of a distal end effector, as well as proximally-located actuators for articulational and rotational movements of the end effector. Control mechanisms and methods refine operator control of end effector actuation and of these articulational and rotational movements. A force limiter mechanism protects the end effector and manipulated objects from the harm of potentially excessive force applied by the operator. The tool may also include other features. A multi-state ratchet for end effector actuation provides enablement-disablement options with tactile feedback. An articulation lock allows the fixing and releasing of both neutral and articulated configurations of the tool and of consequent placement of the end effector. A rotation lock provides for enablement and disablement of rotatability of the end effector.