Surgical Guideline Indicator Mapping for Automated Bill Adjudication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Insurance adjusters lack the clinical expertise to determine the appropriateness of surgical team services, leading to time-consuming and error-prone manual processes in medical bill adjudication, with existing software tools unable to efficiently automate these determinations.

Innovation Solution

A method for automating the determination of surgical team services appropriateness through SGI mapping, which generates and stores associations between medical procedure codes and indications of appropriateness using clinical resource data from multiple sources, such as CMS and ACS, enabling automated adjudication recommendations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual review by insurance adjusters is used to determine appropriateness of surgical team services, then clinical expertise can be applied, but the process becomes time-consuming and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjudication accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing clinical resource data from multiple sources (CMS, ACS, etc.) to generate and store a mapping database of medical procedure codes to surgical guideline indicators before actual adjudication. This pre-computed mapping enables rapid automated lookup during bill processing without requiring real-time clinical analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mapping database that bridges the gap between complex clinical guidelines and automated adjudication systems. The mapping database translates clinical resource data into structured procedure code-to-guideline indicator associations, allowing automated systems to access clinical expertise without requiring human adjusters to interpret complex guidelines during processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If existing software searching tools are used, then automated processing is enabled, but the tools are incapable of effectively determining appropriateness of surgical team services

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidadjudication accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The mapping database serves as an intermediary layer that transforms unstructured clinical resource data into a structured format that software tools can efficiently query. By pre-processing clinical guidelines into procedure code-to-indicator mappings, the system enables automated tools to perform reliable appropriateness determinations without requiring complex real-time analysis capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary processing of clinical resource data to create the mapping database before automated adjudication begins. This pre-computation of procedure code mappings allows subsequent automated processing to achieve both high productivity through efficient database queries and high reliability by leveraging pre-validated clinical guidelines

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If multiple clinical data sources are integrated, then comprehensiveness of guidelines is improved, but complexity of data processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguideline comprehensivenessVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the integration process into distinct phases: first obtaining clinical resource data from multiple sources (CMS, ACS, etc.), then processing this data to generate procedure code-to-guideline indicator mappings, and finally storing these mappings in a structured database. This segmentation allows the system to handle multiple data sources systematically without overwhelming processing complexity during actual adjudication

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary integration and harmonization of multiple clinical data sources before adjudication begins. By pre-processing data from CMS, ACS, and other sources to create unified procedure code mappings, the system achieves comprehensive guideline coverage while reducing processing complexity during actual bill adjudication through efficient database queries

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11651852B2Methods for surgical guideline indicator mapping to facilitate automated medical bill adjudication and devices thereof
Publication Date: 2023.05.16 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US11651852B2 patent drawing
  • US11651852B2 patent drawing
  • US11651852B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for automating the process of automatically determining appropriateness of surgical team services performed during a medical procedure. Clinical resource data with known surgical guideline indicator (SGIs) may be us used to generate and store a mapping of medical procedure codes to indications of the appropriateness of surgical team services corresponding to the medical procedure codes. A medical bill associated with an insurance claim may be analyzed to extract a medical procedure code corresponding to a surgical procedure, and an automated adjudication recommendation for the medical bill may be made based on the mapping between medical procedure codes and SGIs.