Selectable Handle Biasing for Surgical Jaws

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Minimally invasive surgical instruments often have uncontrolled jaw opening, which can cause damage to surrounding tissue during fine dissection, as they are biased to an open configuration, lacking user-selectable options for jaw biasing.

Innovation Solution

The surgical device incorporates a biasing mechanism with a handle housing and a trigger that allows selective biasing of opposed jaws to open, closed, or neutral positions using a combination of opening and closing springs, along with a lever to control the actuating member, enabling user-selectable configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the jaws are biased to an open configuration, then the device is easier to operate and reset, but uncontrolled opening occurs causing tissue damage during fine dissection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidtissue damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The biasing mechanism transitions from a static fixed-bias configuration to a dynamic adjustable-bias configuration. The surgeon can select between open-biased, closed-biased, or neutral configurations based on the specific surgical task, allowing the system to adapt its mechanical characteristics dynamically throughout the procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the biasing parameter from a fixed state to a selectable state with multiple configurations. By providing different biasing modes (open-biased, closed-biased, neutral), the system allows modification of the mechanical parameter that controls jaw behavior, thereby preventing tissue damage while maintaining ease of operation as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If a biasing switch with multiple configurations is added, then user-selectable jaw configurations are achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The biasing mechanism serves multiple functions within a single integrated system. It can provide open-biased configuration for general use, closed-biased configuration for fine dissection, and neutral configuration for precise manual control, making the device universally adaptable to different surgical requirements without requiring multiple separate devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention merges the biasing mechanism and the selection control into an integrated assembly. The biasing switch with actuator is combined with the trigger mechanism and spring system, allowing multiple functions (open-bias, closed-bias, neutral) to be achieved through a unified control structure rather than separate independent systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the jaws are biased to a closed configuration, then uncontrolled opening is prevented, but the surgeon must continuously counteract the closing force

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue damageVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows dynamic selection of biasing configurations. When closed-biased mode is selected, the jaws provide stable closed-biased behavior for fine dissection. When open-biased mode is selected, the jaws provide easy reset behavior. The surgeon can dynamically switch between these modes depending on the immediate surgical needs, optimizing both safety and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The biasing parameter can be changed from closed-biased to open-biased or neutral based on the surgical task. This parameter change allows the system to eliminate the continuous counteracting force requirement when open-biased configuration is selected, while still providing the option for closed-biased configuration when stability is the priority.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution allows surgeons to choose the jaw configuration, preventing uncontrolled opening and ensuring the device is suitable for a variety of surgical procedures, reducing tissue damage and enhancing procedural versatility.

Implementation Method 1

The opening spring can be configured to bias the opposed jaws to the open position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

the closing spring can be configured to bias the opposed jaws to the closed position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP2394591B1Selectable handle biasing
Publication Date: 2013.04.03 ETHICON ENDO SURGERY INC
  • EP2394591B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP2394591B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2C
  • EP2394591B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3C

AI summary

Devices and related methods are disclosed that generally relate to surgical devices provided for use in various surgical procedures. In some embodiments, the surgical devices can include a handle housing and an elongate shaft having opposed jaws disposed at a distal end thereof. The handle housing can have a handle portion and a trigger configured to pivot relative to the handle portion to open and close the opposed jaws. A biasing switch can generally be disposed in and/or on the handle housing and can be selectively movable between a first configuration in which the opposed jaws are biased to an open position, and a second configuration in which the opposed jaws are biased to a closed position.