Surgical Hub Feedback Control for Procedure-Aware Device Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Medical systems and facilities face challenges in implementing new technologies due to patient safety concerns and a desire to maintain traditional practices, leading to slower adoption of improved systems and lack of communication with other facilities, which hinders better interconnection and sharing of knowledge.

Innovation Solution

A surgical system comprising a modular device, data sources, and a surgical hub that communicably couples to these sources, allowing data exchange to adjust responses based on procedure progress and situational parameters, such as comparing recommended and actual checklists and layouts to send alerts for missing items or deviations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional practices are maintained to ensure patient safety, then reliability is improved, but adaptability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient safetyVSAvoidadoption of new technologies
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The surgical hub implements real-time feedback mechanisms by monitoring procedural data, checklist compliance, and situational parameters, then providing alerts and adjustments to maintain safety standards while enabling adoption of new technologies through data-driven decision support

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The surgical hub acts as an intermediary between traditional surgical practices and new technologies, facilitating integration by processing data from various sources, comparing actual procedures against recommended standards, and providing guidance that bridges conventional methods with innovative tools

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If real-time data exchange and monitoring are implemented, then operational efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The surgical hub provides multiple functions including data collection, processing, comparison against standards, alert generation, and procedural monitoring within a single integrated platform, improving operational efficiency while consolidating complexity into one universal system rather than multiple separate devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically monitors procedural progress, compares actual checklists and layouts against recommended standards, and generates alerts without requiring constant manual intervention, thereby improving operational efficiency while the automated nature manages the complexity internally

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12133773B2Surgical hub and modular device response adjustment based on situational awareness
Publication Date: 2024.11.05 CILAG GMBH INTERNATIONAL
  • US12133773B2 patent drawing
  • US12133773B2 patent drawing
  • US12133773B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A surgical system for use in a surgical procedure is disclosed. The surgical system includes a modular device, at least one data source, and a surgical hub configured to communicably couple to the at least one data source and the modular device. The surgical hub comprises a control circuit configured to receive data from the at least one data source. The data is determinative of a progress status the surgical procedure. The control circuit is further configured to adjust a response to a sensed parameter based on the progress status.