Surgical Instrument Tracking via Machine Vision Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Surgical device reprocessing in hospitals faces challenges due to inadequate tracking of complex processes, leading to issues like loss of productivity, mismanagement of equipment, and potential healthcare-associated infections, with machine vision techniques struggling with large datasets and confidence issues in identifying surgical instruments.

Innovation Solution

A system incorporating an image capture device and a computing device that uses machine vision techniques to identify and track surgical instruments, including determining sterilization status and performing operations based on flagged events, with features like optically active articles and background surfaces to enhance identification accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If machine vision techniques are used to identify individual surgical instruments, then identification capability is improved, but computing resources required increase significantly when handling large data sets

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification capabilityVSAvoidcomputing resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the identification process by using multiple image capture devices positioned at different locations (sterile storage area, sterilization area, distribution area) to capture images of surgical instruments at various stages. This distributes the processing load across multiple localized systems rather than requiring one centralized system to process all images, reducing the computing resource burden on any single system while maintaining identification capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Extent of automation

If machine vision techniques are used to identify surgical instruments, then automated tracking is improved, but confidence values and classification accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated trackingVSAvoidconfidence values
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where captured images are processed and compared against known instrument characteristics. The processor provides feedback by determining whether captured images match expected instrument patterns, and can trigger alerts or notifications when confidence levels are insufficient. This feedback loop allows the system to self-correct and verify classifications, improving reliability while maintaining automated tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by capturing images at multiple predetermined locations (sterile storage area, sterilization area, distribution area) before instruments are used. This creates a chain of custody record with pre-established confidence levels at each stage, allowing the system to verify instrument identity multiple times throughout the process rather than relying on a single classification event.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If multiple image capture devices are deployed to track instruments through multiple areas, then tracking completeness is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking completenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses universal image capture devices that can function in multiple areas (sterile storage area, sterilization area, distribution area) rather than requiring specialized devices for each location. Each device performs the same basic function of capturing instrument images, but the system integrates data from all locations to achieve complete tracking. This multi-functionality approach reduces overall system complexity while maintaining tracking completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If automated operations are performed based on instrument identification, then productivity is improved, but risk of errors increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoiderror rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary verification by capturing and analyzing images at multiple stages (sterile storage area, sterilization area, distribution area) before automated operations are executed. This preliminary action creates multiple verification points where instrument identity and sterilization status can be confirmed, reducing the risk of errors in automated operations while maintaining productivity improvements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11462319B2Sterilization process management
Publication Date: 2022.10.04 SOLVENTUM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES CO
  • US11462319B2 patent drawing
  • US11462319B2 patent drawing
  • US11462319B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the present disclosure relate to a system including an image capture device and a computing device configured to receive a test image from the image capture device corresponding to a first surgical instrument, determine an identity type of the first surgical instrument using the test image in a machine vision technique, determine whether the first surgical instrument is flagged, and perform at least one operation in response to whether the first surgical instrument is flagged.