Surgical Lockout Mechanism Preventing Premature Actuation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Surgical devices often face challenges in preventing premature actuation of cutting mechanisms, leading to unintended tissue injury or jamming, due to the difficulty in distinguishing between closure and cutting actuators during surgical procedures.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a surgical device with a blocking member that obstructs access to the cutting actuator when the jaws are in the open position, allowing access only when the jaws are closed, ensuring the cutting mechanism is not actuated until tissue is properly grasped, featuring various configurations such as blocking shields, arms, and linkage mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If independent actuators are provided for closure and cutting functions, then the device can perform multiple functions, but the difficulty in distinguishing between actuators leads to premature cutting actuation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-functionalityVSAvoidactuator distinction
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

A blocking member is introduced as an intermediary element between the user's finger and the cutting actuator. This blocking member physically prevents direct access to the cutting actuator when the jaws are in the open position, thereby eliminating the confusion between closure and cutting actuators while maintaining both functions' independence

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The blocking member is designed to be movable rather than fixed. It dynamically changes its position based on the jaw state - blocking the cutting actuator when jaws are open, and moving away to allow access when jaws are closed. This dynamic behavior adapts the interface to the current operational state

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If the cutting actuator is always accessible, then ease of operation is improved, but premature actuation causes tissue injury and device jamming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator accessibilityVSAvoidunintended tissue injury
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The blocking member performs a preliminary protective action by preventing access to the cutting actuator before premature actuation can occur. When the jaws are in the open position, the blocking member is already in place to block any potential premature activation, thereby preventing tissue injury and device jamming before they can happen

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs a preliminary check through the blocking member's position before allowing cutting actuation. The blocking member must be moved away from the cutting actuator by the closure mechanism before the cutting actuator becomes accessible, ensuring the correct sequence of operations is followed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If a blocking member is added to prevent premature actuation, then safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of premature actuationVSAvoidactuator system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The blocking member is merged with the closure mechanism rather than being a completely separate system. The closure actuator's movement directly controls the blocking member's position, combining two functions (closure and blocking) into an integrated system that reduces overall complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The closure mechanism automatically controls the blocking member's position without requiring separate control systems. When the closure actuator moves, it automatically positions the blocking member to either block or unblock the cutting actuator, making the system self-regulating and reducing the need for additional actuators or control mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10842524B2Lockout mechanisms for surgical devices
Publication Date: 2020.11.24 CILAG GMBH INTERNATIONAL
  • US10842524B2 patent drawing
  • US10842524B2 patent drawing
  • US10842524B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various surgical devices are provided having mechanisms for preventing premature actuation of a cutting mechanism. These devices generally include a handle having one or more actuators and an effector disposed at a distal end of the device and configured to grasp tissue. When the end effector is in an open position, a firing actuator can be positioned so that it cannot be actuated by a user. For example, the firing actuator can be obstructed by a shield or arm when the end effector is in the open position. In other embodiments, the firing actuator can be hidden in a recess formed in the closure actuator until the end effector is moved to the closed position. When the end effector is in the closed position, the firing actuator can be engaged to advance a cutting mechanism, thereby cutting the tissue grasped by the end effector.