Surgical Microscope Stand with C-Shape Hollow Structure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Surgical microscopes face challenges with disturbing contours and resistance forces due to the design of their stands and support arms, which interfere with the operating environment and field of view, and require reduced bearing frictions and compactness.

Innovation Solution

A stand with a C-shaped structure and hollow reinforcements, featuring a base part and stand parts with integrated mounting elements for electronic components, and a suspension mechanism with rotary joints allowing the microscope head to be positioned in three directions, while relocating electronic components to reduce the center of gravity and minimize the cross-section of the carrier arm.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If electronic components are mounted on the support arms, then the microscope head can be positioned and controlled, but the support arms form disturbing contours in the field of view and increase resistance forces during rotation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicroscope head positioningVSAvoiddisturbing contours in field of view
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts electronic components from the support arms and relocates them to the base part of the stand. This removes the disturbing contours from the field of view while maintaining all necessary electronic functionalities for microscope operation and control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent relocates electronic components from a horizontal distribution on support arms to a vertical concentration in the base part. This dimensional reorganization eliminates interfering contours in the surgical field while centralizing mass to reduce the center of gravity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If cables are guided along the rotational axes, then electronic functionalities are realized, but resistance forces are generated during rotational movements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectronic functionalitiesVSAvoidresistance forces during rotation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts cables from the rotational paths on support arms and relocates electronic components to the base part. This eliminates cable friction during rotation while maintaining all electronic functionalities through centralized positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the stand parts are made compact, then interfering contours are reduced, but the structural strength and stiffness may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterfering contoursVSAvoidstructural strength and stiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges all electronic components into a single integrated unit within the base part. This consolidation achieves compactness that minimizes interfering contours while the unified structure provides sufficient structural strength and stiffness for stable microscope operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite construction in the base part, combining multiple materials with complementary properties to achieve both compact dimensions and high structural strength, eliminating the trade-off between size and strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Force

If the center of gravity is reduced by relocating components, then motion forces are lowered, but the assembly space must be optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion forcesVSAvoidassembly space
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines all electronic components into a single integrated unit in the base part. This merging achieves both center of gravity reduction for lower motion forces and compact assembly space optimization through centralized mass concentration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11324565B2Stand for a surgical microscope, surgical microscopy system, and method for optimizing an assembly space of a surgical microscopy system
Publication Date: 2022.05.10 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC AG
  • US11324565B2 patent drawing
  • US11324565B2 patent drawing
  • US11324565B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A stand for a surgical microscope and a method for optimizing an assembly space of a surgical microscopy system are provided. The stand includes a base part, a stand part forming a c-shape structure, having a first end and a second end, and being mounted on the base part at the first end. The stand part has a hollow structure with reinforcements arranged within the hollow structure and the reinforcements extend vertically through the entire hollow structure. The stand part may include a first stand part element and a second stand part element, and the first and second stand part elements are arranged at a horizontal distance relative to one another and form together the c-shape structure. The method includes relocating electronic components from the arms to an area of the stand part thereby shifting a center of gravity of the stand.