Surgical Microscope Context-Dependent Control Algorithm

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Surgical microscopes require manual setting adjustments during operations, leading to cognitive load and workflow interruptions due to the need for optimal visualization and unimpeded workflow, which existing technologies fail to address effectively.

Innovation Solution

An automated method for determining surgical microscope settings using context parameters, such as surgical tools, regions of interest, user preferences, and operation phases, through a control algorithm that prioritizes and adapts settings based on real-time monitoring and machine-learned models to optimize visualization and workflow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual setting adjustments are made during operations to optimize visualization, then visualization quality is improved, but cognitive load and workflow interruptions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisualization qualityVSAvoidcognitive load and workflow continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control algorithm automatically monitors operation context parameters and adjusts microscope settings without surgeon intervention. The system serves itself by detecting contextual changes (e.g., surgical phase, tool usage) and autonomously optimizing visualization parameters, thereby eliminating the need for manual adjustments and reducing cognitive load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes microscope parameters (magnification, illumination, focus) based on detected context parameters. The control algorithm continuously adapts settings by modifying multiple parameters simultaneously according to the surgical situation, achieving optimized visualization without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple assistance functionalities are provided with different requirements, then functional versatility is improved, but target conflicts arise that complicate setting determination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional versatilityVSAvoidsetting determination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The single control algorithm handles multiple assistance functionalities (e.g., illumination optimization, contrast enhancement, region-of-interest tracking) within one unified system. Rather than requiring separate control mechanisms for each function, the algorithm universally manages all functionalities by integrating their requirements and resolving conflicts through contextual prioritization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms where the control algorithm continuously monitors the effects of applied settings on multiple functionality requirements. When target conflicts arise between different functionalities, the algorithm adjusts parameters based on feedback from performance metrics and context parameters, dynamically resolving conflicts to maintain overall system optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If automated control algorithms are implemented to reduce manual adjustments, then workflow continuity is improved, but adaptability to different surgical contexts may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow continuityVSAvoidcontext adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control algorithm is designed to be dynamic rather than static, continuously adapting its behavior based on real-time context parameters. The system monitors changes in surgical phase, tool usage, and anatomical structures, and automatically adjusts its control strategy accordingly, maintaining both automation benefits and contextual adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of context parameters and predicts optimal settings before actual surgical needs arise. By pre-processing context information and preparing appropriate parameter configurations, the algorithm ensures rapid adaptation to changing surgical conditions while maintaining continuous workflow without interruptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12196937B2Context-dependent control of a surgical microscope
Publication Date: 2025.01.14 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC AG
  • US12196937B2 patent drawing
  • US12196937B2 patent drawing
  • US12196937B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A parameterization of a control algorithm of a surgical microscope is carried out on the basis of one or more context parameters of an operation. On the basis of the parameterization, the control algorithm then is applied to one or more state indicators associated with a first setting of the surgical microscope in order thus to obtain a second setting of the surgical microscope. By way of example, the parameterization can comprise one or more prioritization operations.