Surgical Device Motor Control via Stored Force Profiles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current powered surgical devices lack effective control over retraction forces, which can lead to system damage or malfunction and prolonged surgical procedures due to the absence of feedback-based control during the retraction phase.

Innovation Solution

A powered handheld electromechanical surgical device equipped with a motor, sensor, and controller that uses force feedback from a strain gauge to control motor speed during extension and retraction, storing force and speed profiles to manage retraction forces without explicit feedback during this phase.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If feedback-based control is implemented during retraction phase, then retraction forces are controlled and system damage is prevented, but device complexity increases due to additional sensors and control systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretraction force controlVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system determines speed and force profiles during the extension phase when feedback is available, and then applies these pre-determined profiles during retraction. This preliminary action during extension allows the retraction phase to proceed with controlled forces without requiring real-time feedback, thus improving reliability while avoiding the complexity of continuous feedback control during retraction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The retraction phase copies the speed and force profiles that were determined during the extension phase. By replicating the controlled profile approach rather than implementing independent real-time control during retraction, the system achieves force control reliability without the full complexity of dual-phase feedback systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If real-time force feedback control is used during retraction, then system damage is prevented, but surgical procedure time increases due to prolonged control cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem protectionVSAvoidsurgical procedure time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control profiles are established during the extension phase before retraction begins. This preliminary determination of speed and force parameters eliminates the need for continuous real-time control calculations during retraction, thereby preventing system damage while maintaining efficient surgical procedure timing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If speed control during extension is adjusted based on sensed force, then manufacturing precision and operation safety are improved, but device complexity increases due to additional control processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrive component control precisionVSAvoidcontrol processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor detects force applied to the drive component during extension, and the controller adjusts motor speed based on this feedback to maintain precise control. This feedback mechanism ensures safe and precise operation while the controller processes the force data to determine appropriate speed adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The controller modifies motor operating parameters (speed) in response to sensed force conditions during extension. By dynamically adjusting speed based on force feedback, the system achieves precise control and safe operation through parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution ensures controlled retraction forces, minimizing the risk of system damage and reducing surgical procedure times by utilizing stored force and speed profiles to adjust motor speed accordingly, even in the absence of real-time feedback during retraction.

Implementation Method 1

a sensor configured to sense force exerted on the drive component during extension of the drive component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStrain gauge: Piezoresistive Effect

Data Source

PatentUS20240341757A1Powered surgical devices including predictive motor control
Publication Date: 2024.10.17 COVIDIEN LP
  • US20240341757A1 patent drawing
  • US20240341757A1 patent drawing
  • US20240341757A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A powered handheld electromechanical surgical device includes a motor configured to drive extension and retraction of a drive component, a sensor configured to sense force exerted on the drive component during extension of the drive component, and a controller including a processor and a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to receive the sensed force from the sensor, control a speed of the motor during extension of the drive component in accordance with the sensed force, determine a speed profile or a force profile during extension of the drive component, and control a speed of the motor during retraction of the drive component in accordance with the speed profile or the force profile.