Surgical Retractor With Pivotable Arms For Rib Stress Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional surgical retraction devices for sternotomy fail to evenly distribute forces across the sternum, leading to increased tension and pain, particularly due to the varying rigidity of the cranial and caudal sternum halves, which can result in rib fractures and discomfort postoperatively.

Innovation Solution

A surgical retraction device with adjustable retaining elements on spreader arms that allow for variable positioning and resilient mounting, enabling adaptation of forces to the sternum's different sections without manual intervention, thereby reducing stress peaks on individual ribs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If conventional retraction devices with fixed spreading arms are used, then the sternum can be opened, but unfavorable force ratios occur due to different stiffness of cranial and caudal sternum halves

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce distribution on ribsVSAvoidadaptability to varying sternum stiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The spreading arms are made pivotably mounted on the holding device, allowing dynamic adjustment of the spreading angle. This enables the device to adapt to the different stiffness characteristics of cranial and caudal sternum halves, distributing forces more favorably across the ribs during retraction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device allows changing the geometric parameters of the spreading arms through pivotal movement. By adjusting the spreading angle and orientation, the force distribution parameters can be optimized to match the varying mechanical properties of different sternum regions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If the sternum is opened with conventional devices, then surgical access is achieved, but increased tension occurs in cranially located ribs due to greater stiffness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical accessVSAvoidrib tension and fracture risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The pivotable mounting allows the spreading arms to dynamically adjust during the opening process, reducing concentrated tension on stiff cranial ribs while maintaining adequate surgical access. The movement compensates for stiffness variations, preventing excessive force on vulnerable rib regions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device design anticipates the higher stiffness of cranial ribs and incorporates pivotable joints that automatically reduce force transmission to these vulnerable areas during the opening process, cushioning against potential rib fractures before they occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Force

If additional readjustment or adjustment possibilities are added to conventional devices, then force distribution can be improved, but the process becomes more complicated and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce distribution on ribsVSAvoidadjustment mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of complex adjustment mechanisms, the invention uses simple pivotable joints that automatically adapt to the sternum's geometry during opening. This dynamic adaptation achieves favorable force distribution without requiring complicated manual adjustments or additional device components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device allows for a gentler opening of the sternum, reducing the risk of rib fractures and postoperative pain by evenly loading the adjoining ribs, thus improving surgical outcomes.

Implementation Method 1

one or more retention elements for retaining bone material, for example, of the severed sternum, are arranged on each of the spreading arms; the at least one retention element is spring-elastically held in its position in the retraction direction relative to the spreader arm

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring-elastic bearing: Spring

Implementation Method 2

the spreading arms are divided into two sections, with a first section being held on a holding device and a second section pivotally mounted on the first section

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPivotal mounting: Hinge

Data Source

PatentEP2802272B1Surgical retractor
Publication Date: 2019.03.06 AESCULAP AG
  • EP2802272B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2802272B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2802272B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a surgical retractor, particularly for the retraction of a separated sternum, with a holding device and two spreader arms, wherein the spreader arms are mounted with one end on the holding device, at a distance from each other that is adjustable in a spreading plane, and at least two retaining elements for retention of bone material, for example of the separated sternum, are arranged on each of the spreader arms. To develop this retractor for sternotomy in such a way as to permit gentler opening of the separated sternum, it is proposed that at least one of the retaining elements is mounted such that its position can be modified in the retraction direction with respect to that end of the spreader arm mounted on the holding device.