Surgical Robot Power Switch Control for Accidental Shutdown Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robotic-assisted surgical devices face risks of accidental shutdown due to misoperation or software failures, leading to interruptions and safety hazards, with existing solutions either relying solely on hardware or software controls, which are inadequate in preventing misshutdowns and increasing development and material costs.

Innovation Solution

An on/off control device with a hardware circuit that detects both the shutdown button action and software signals, incorporating a system power supply module, on/off key detection circuit, start and shutdown action circuits, and a control module to ensure safe and reliable power management, reducing the likelihood of accidental shutdowns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If pure software control is used to prevent misoperation shutdown, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to software failure risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of misoperation shutdownVSAvoidsoftware failure risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines hardware shutdown circuit and software control into a unified shutdown system. The hardware shutdown button can trigger shutdown through either hardware circuit directly or software control, and the system integrates both pathways to work together. This merging allows the system to benefit from both hardware's immediate response and software's operational safety checks, resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a controller as an intermediary between the hardware shutdown button and the shutdown execution. When the shutdown button is pressed, the controller detects the signal and determines whether to execute shutdown based on system state and safety conditions. This intermediary layer prevents direct hardware shutdown while maintaining operational safety, addressing both ease of operation and reliability concerns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If hardware shutdown circuit is used for immediate shutdown, then productivity is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to accidental shutdown risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshutdown response speedVSAvoidaccidental shutdown prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by having the controller detect and process the shutdown button signal before actual shutdown execution. The controller performs preliminary determination of whether shutdown conditions are met, and only then proceeds to execute the shutdown. This preliminary step prevents accidental shutdown while maintaining quick response capability when shutdown is truly needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback mechanism where the controller continuously monitors system state and evaluates whether shutdown should be executed based on the shutdown button signal. The controller provides feedback by determining the appropriateness of shutdown action, and this feedback loop ensures that shutdown occurs only when safe and appropriate, preventing accidental shutdown while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If redundant hardware is added to prevent software failure misshutdown, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware failure preventionVSAvoidadditional chips and hardware
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses the controller as an intermediary that already exists in the system to prevent software failure misshutdown. Instead of adding redundant hardware, the controller's determination function acts as a smart intermediary that filters out erroneous shutdown signals caused by software failures. This approach improves reliability without increasing device complexity through additional chips.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the existing controller to perform the additional function of determining whether to execute shutdown based on system state. The controller uses its existing processing capabilities to evaluate shutdown appropriateness, eliminating the need for separate redundant hardware components. This self-service approach maintains reliability improvement while avoiding increased device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP3905524B1Switch control apparatus and method for robot-assisted surgical device
Publication Date: 2024.10.02 BEIJING SURGERII ROBOTICS CO LTD
  • EP3905524B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3905524B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5
  • EP3905524B1 patent drawingFigure 6

AI summary

Disclosed are anti-misshutdown on/off control device for robotic-assisted surgical device and a control method thereof. The control device comprises: an on/off key operable to trigger a start action or a shutdown action; an on/off control module operable to detect the shutdown action of the on/off key and obtain a shutdown intention through man-machine interaction; an on/off hardware circuit operable to detect the start action and send a signal to supply power. The on/off hardware circuit is operable to detect the shutdown action of the on/off key and a shutdown control signal sent by the on/off control module and send a signal to cut off power supply. The control device can, under little increase of the cost, reduce the probability of accidental shutdown possibly caused by system software and hardware failure or man-made misoperation and improve the operating reliability of device.