Surgical Stapler Motor Velocity Control via Displacement Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Motorized surgical stapling and cutting instruments face challenges in accurately controlling the velocity of cutting members and articulation of end effectors to adapt to varying tissue conditions, leading to inconsistent performance and potential tissue damage.

Innovation Solution

A surgical instrument with a displacement member that translates over predefined zones, coupled with a motor, position sensor, and timer circuit, which measures displacement and sets command velocities based on measured positions and elapsed time to adjust for tissue conditions, enabling closed-loop feedback control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If open loop control is used for motor velocity, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision and consistency of stapling/cutting operations deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidstapling and cutting operation consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements closed-loop feedback control by measuring the actual velocity of the cutting member using position sensors and timer circuits, comparing it to the commanded velocity, and adjusting motor control signals to eliminate velocity errors. This feedback mechanism ensures consistent stapling and cutting operations across varying tissue conditions while maintaining manageable system complexity through structured control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If constant velocity is maintained, then ease of operation is improved, but adaptability to varying tissue conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevelocity control simplicityVSAvoidtissue condition adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic velocity adjustment where the commanded velocity is modified in real-time based on feedback from position measurements. The control circuit calculates actual velocity by comparing position changes over time intervals and adjusts motor commands dynamically to compensate for tissue thickness variations, force to fire variations, and other tissue conditions, thereby maintaining both ease of operation and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If velocity is increased to improve productivity, then productivity is improved, but force to fire increases causing potential tissue damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiring stroke speedVSAvoidforce to fire
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously monitors the actual velocity of the cutting member during the firing stroke and compares it to the commanded velocity. When tissue conditions require lower velocities to reduce force to fire, the feedback mechanism detects the velocity deviation and adjusts motor control signals accordingly, enabling high productivity when conditions permit while preventing tissue damage when force limits are approached.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Force

If velocity is decreased to reduce force to fire, then force to fire is reduced improving safety, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce to fireVSAvoidfiring stroke speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts velocity based on real-time feedback from position measurements and tissue condition assessment. Rather than operating at a fixed low velocity, the control circuit modulates velocity dynamically - reducing it when force to fire exceeds thresholds and maintaining higher velocities when tissue conditions permit - thereby optimizing both safety and productivity throughout the firing stroke.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

5Manufacturing precision

If measured displacement is used to adjust velocity, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional sensors and control circuitry

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevelocity measurement accuracyVSAvoidsensor and control circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes feedback from position sensors and timer circuits to measure actual cutting member velocity by calculating displacement over specified time intervals. This measured velocity feeds back to the control circuit, which adjusts motor commands to maintain commanded velocity despite variations in tissue conditions, load, or mechanical friction, thereby achieving high velocity measurement accuracy and consistent stapling/cutting precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

6Adaptability or versatility

If closed loop feedback control is implemented, then adaptability to tissue conditions is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue condition responseVSAvoidcontrol system architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system implements closed-loop feedback by continuously measuring cutting member position with sensors, calculating actual velocity over time intervals, comparing it to commanded velocity, and adjusting motor control signals accordingly. This feedback architecture enables real-time adaptation to varying tissue conditions including thickness, density, and force to fire variations, while maintaining structured control logic that manages system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

7Measurement precision

If velocity measurements are taken at fixed time intervals, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases due to measurement overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevelocity measurement accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs velocity measurements at periodic fixed time intervals by recording position at the beginning and end of each interval, calculating displacement, and determining actual velocity. This periodic measurement approach provides sufficiently accurate velocity data for feedback control while minimizing measurement overhead and maintaining real-time responsiveness for adaptive velocity control during the firing stroke.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS11517325B2Closed loop feedback control of motor velocity of a surgical stapling and cutting instrument based on measured displacement distance traveled over a specified time interval
Publication Date: 2022.12.06 CILAG GMBH INTERNATIONAL
  • US11517325B2 patent drawing
  • US11517325B2 patent drawing
  • US11517325B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A motorized surgical instrument is disclosed. The surgical instrument includes a displacement member, a motor coupled to the displacement member, a control circuit coupled to the motor, a position sensor coupled to the control circuit, and a timer circuit coupled to the control circuit. The timer circuit is configured to measure elapsed time and to to receive, from the position sensor, a position of the displacement member in a current zone during a set time interval, measure displacement of the displacement member at a set time at the end of the set time interval, wherein the measured displacement is defined as the distance traveled by the displacement member during the set time interval at a set command velocity for the current zone, and set a command velocity of the displacement member for a subsequent zone based on the measured displacement of the displacement member within the current zone.