Surgical Power Tool Haptic Control Near Tissue Boundaries

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Handheld power tools in computer-assisted surgery lack feedback mechanisms to ensure safe and precise operation, particularly near boundaries or target volumes during surgical procedures.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a power tool, a battery, and a control unit with wireless receivers and haptic actuators that adjust, regulate, or interrupt electrical current based on tracking data, and include vibration sensors to manage tool vibrations, ensuring safe operation near boundaries or target volumes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If handheld power tools are used in computer-assisted surgery, then surgical efficiency and precision are improved, but lack of feedback mechanisms reduces safety and control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical efficiencyVSAvoidsafety control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements multiple feedback mechanisms including haptic feedback actuators that provide tactile resistance when approaching boundary zones, visual feedback through displays showing real-time tool position relative to target volumes and boundaries, and audio feedback signals. This allows surgeons to maintain high surgical efficiency while having continuous feedback about tool position and safety zones, resolving the contradiction between productivity and safety control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit serves as an intermediary between the surgeon and the power tool motor. It receives input from the surgeon, processes it along with boundary zone data from the database, and regulates motor operation accordingly. This intermediary layer enables safety control without directly interfering with surgical efficiency by translating surgeon intent into regulated tool operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If control mechanisms are added to provide safety feedback, then safety and precision are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety controlVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit performs multiple functions: it regulates motor operation based on boundary zones, tracks tool position, manages haptic feedback, controls visual displays, and processes audio feedback. By consolidating these diverse safety and feedback functions into a single multi-functional control unit, the patent improves safety control without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit acts as an intermediary that integrates multiple subsystems (motor control, tracking, haptic feedback, display, audio). Rather than having separate complex systems for each function, the intermediary control unit coordinates them all, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive safety control capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If real-time control and feedback systems are implemented, then surgical precision and safety are improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical precisionVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit updates haptic feedback, visual displays, and audio signals at periodic intervals based on tool position changes and boundary proximity, rather than continuously at maximum rate. This periodic update approach maintains high surgical precision and safety feedback while reducing overall energy consumption compared to continuous maximum-rate operation of all feedback systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances surgical precision and safety by providing real-time feedback and control over power tool operation, reducing the risk of unintended tissue damage.

Implementation Method 1

The controller can include one or more vibration sensors, one or more haptic actuators

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHaptic feedback: Vibration

Implementation Method 2

The controller can include one or more vibration sensors, one or more haptic actuators

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration detection: Vibration

Data Source

PatentUS12569260B2Controls for power tools or instruments including bone saws and drills including safety and directional control and haptic feedback
Publication Date: 2026.03.10 ONPOINT MEDICAL INC
  • US12569260B2 patent drawing
  • US12569260B2 patent drawing
  • US12569260B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the present disclosure relate to systems for performing a surgical procedure using a power tool or power instrument with systems, devices and/or control units for reducing vibration of the power tool or power instrument.