Surgical Voice Control System Error Feedback Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional endoscopic surgical systems are not user-friendly for performing therapeutic procedures due to the requirement for hierarchical and intentional voice commands to operate medical instruments, making them difficult to use effectively.

Innovation Solution

A surgical system controlling method and apparatus that includes a voice information inputting step, voice recognition processing, guidance data storage, and guidance voice generation, allowing for hierarchical recognition and feedback on operation state voice information, with error guidance provided when recognition rates fall below predetermined thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If hierarchical and intentional voice commands are used to operate medical instruments, then the system can control multiple instruments, but the system becomes difficult to use and not user-friendly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoice control capabilityVSAvoiduser-friendliness
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides real-time feedback to the user by announcing recognized voice commands and their corresponding operations. This feedback mechanism allows users to confirm that their voice input was correctly interpreted, reducing anxiety about misrecognition and making the system feel more responsive and user-friendly while maintaining full voice control automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The voice recognition system acts as an intermediary between the user and the complex instrument control system. It translates natural language voice commands into structured control signals, shielding users from the complexity of hierarchical command structures while maintaining precise control over multiple medical instruments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If voice recognition is used to control surgical instruments, then operatability is improved, but misrecognition may occur leading to operational errors

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveoperatabilityVSAvoidrecognition accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system announces each recognized voice command before execution, providing users with an opportunity to verify correctness. If a command is misrecognized or not recognized, the system can prompt the user to repeat or clarify, preventing erroneous operations while maintaining ease of use

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system takes preliminary action by validating and confirming voice commands before execution. This preventive approach counteracts potential misrecognition errors by checking recognition confidence levels and requiring user confirmation for critical operations, ensuring reliability without compromising operatability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS8010368B2Surgical system controlling apparatus and surgical system controlling method
Publication Date: 2011.08.30 OLYMPUS CORPORATION(JP)
  • US8010368B2 patent drawing
  • US8010368B2 patent drawing
  • US8010368B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In this invention, a voice recognition engine 110 outputs to a controlling section 103 a matching state of a voice input signal as an error code. Then, the controlling section 103 determines the matching state based on the error code in the error determination section 105 and outputs to a voice synthesizing engine 113 guidance data according to the matching state based on a timing control by a guidance timing controlling section 107. According to such a configuration, this invention improves operatability by voice operation, while reducing a risk of erroneous recognition by maintaining a predetermined matching rate.