Surrogate Metric Selection for Web Design Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for testing website and computer application design changes are inefficient and inaccurate, as they often require large amounts of data and struggle to determine the effectiveness of design changes based on user engagement metrics.

Innovation Solution

The use of surrogate metrics that are identified through past experiment data to indicate user experience and engagement, allowing for more efficient and accurate testing by selecting the most sensitive and correlated metrics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional user testing methods are used to determine design effectiveness, then accurate user engagement data can be obtained, but the testing process becomes inefficient and requires large amounts of data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser engagement measurement accuracyVSAvoidtesting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces surrogate metrics as intermediary indicators that indirectly reflect user engagement. Instead of directly measuring complex user engagement behaviors, the system uses proxy metrics (such as interaction frequency, time spent, or completion rates) that are easier to collect and process, thereby improving testing efficiency while maintaining measurement accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary analysis of historical testing data to identify and select optimal surrogate metrics before conducting new experiments. By pre-determining which surrogate metrics best correlate with user engagement based on past results, the system avoids trial-and-error during actual testing, significantly improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If traditional testing methods are used, then comprehensive user response data can be collected, but the amount of testing data required becomes excessively large

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting result reliabilityVSAvoidtesting data quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Surrogate metrics serve as efficient intermediaries that capture user engagement patterns with less data than direct measurement methods. These proxy indicators can reliably indicate user engagement trends using smaller sample sizes, thereby maintaining result reliability while reducing the quantity of testing data needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the measurement approach by changing from direct user engagement parameters to surrogate metric parameters. This parameter transformation allows the system to achieve reliable testing results with reduced data quantities by leveraging the statistical properties and correlations of the surrogate metrics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If multiple surrogate metrics are evaluated, then better indication of user experience can be achieved, but the complexity of metric selection and analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experience indication accuracyVSAvoidmetric selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary evaluation and ranking of surrogate metrics based on historical data analysis before actual testing. By pre-identifying the most relevant and reliable surrogate metrics through correlation analysis with user engagement, the system simplifies the metric selection process while maintaining high measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the metric evaluation process into distinct stages: surrogate metric identification, correlation analysis with user engagement, and selection of optimal metrics. This segmentation organizes the complex task into manageable steps, reducing analytical complexity while improving user experience indication accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250131458A1Sensitive surrogate metrics identification
Publication Date: 2025.04.24 TENCENT AMERICA LLC
  • US20250131458A1 patent drawing
  • US20250131458A1 patent drawing
  • US20250131458A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure includes methods and an apparatus that includes processing circuitry that selects at least one candidate surrogate metric from a plurality of surrogate metrics based on first testing data of a target metric and the plurality of surrogate metrics from a first database in memory. The first testing data have been generated from previously controlled testing of a control variant and a treatment variant of a feature of a webpage or a computer application. The processing circuitry determines current testing results associated with the plurality of surrogate metrics and determines an output of the current controlled testing based on one or more of the current testing results associated with the at least one candidate surrogate metric. If the output indicates the treatment variant replacing the control variant of the feature of the webpage or the computer application, the control variant is replaced with the treatment variant of the feature.