Surrogate Model Calibration for Complex Simulation Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing techniques for calibrating parameters of complex models are costly and time-consuming due to the need for numerous simulations, making it impractical for tasks like sensitivity analysis and parameter optimization.

Innovation Solution

The application of differential machine learning techniques, combined with a simulation and calibration framework, allows for the calibration of parameters by using surrogate models that approximate the behavior of complex models, reducing the need for extensive simulations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional calibration methods using complex models are used, then parameter optimization accuracy is improved, but computational cost and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter optimization accuracyVSAvoidcalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a surrogate model that copies the input-output behavior of the complex model. This surrogate model is trained on a dataset generated from the complex model and can then be used for calibration tasks, replacing repeated executions of the expensive complex model with fast surrogate model predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The surrogate model acts as an intermediary between the user and the complex model. Instead of directly querying the complex model for calibration, the system uses the surrogate model as a mediator that provides approximate predictions, significantly reducing computational overhead while maintaining acceptable accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If traditional calibration methods using complex models are used, then parameter optimization accuracy is improved, but computational resource usage increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter optimization accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The surrogate model copies the essential functionality of the complex model in a computationally efficient form. Once trained, the surrogate model requires minimal computational resources to perform calibration tasks, avoiding the high resource consumption of repeatedly executing the complex model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by training the surrogate model in advance on a dataset generated from the complex model. This upfront investment in training allows subsequent calibration operations to be performed efficiently with minimal computational resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the complex model is used for repeated simulations, then model accuracy is maintained, but the process becomes too costly and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidsimulation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The surrogate model creates a simplified copy of the complex model that maintains the essential input-output relationships. This copy can be executed repeatedly for sensitivity analysis and calibration without the computational burden of the original complex model, dramatically improving productivity while preserving model fidelity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of the model representation by transforming the complex model into a surrogate model with different computational characteristics. The surrogate model uses a different set of parameters (weights and biases) that are learned during training, enabling fast evaluation while maintaining accuracy for the intended purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250028997A1Calibration using differential machine learning
Publication Date: 2025.01.23 WELLS FARGO BANK NA
  • US20250028997A1 patent drawing
  • US20250028997A1 patent drawing
  • US20250028997A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure describes techniques for calibrating parameters for a model of interest. In one example, this disclosure describes identifying, based on a textual description, a model that generates an output based on a set of inputs; selecting a first plurality of parameter values; assembling a set of training samples by observing outputs generated by the model in response to each of the first plurality of parameter values; training a surrogate model, wherein the surrogate model is trained to predict outputs of the model; generating, using the surrogate model, predicted outputs of the model, wherein each of the predicted outputs of the model is based on a different parameter value in a second plurality of parameter values; selecting, based on the predicted outputs of the model, a desired parameter value; and applying the model, using the desired parameter value, to predict a value of interest for an input value.