Multi-Sensor Surveillance Consistency Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current surveillance systems in places like transport terminals and public areas face challenges in accurately tracking and recognizing individuals across multiple cameras, particularly in ensuring consistency of positional and temporal data, which affects detection and recognition performance.

Innovation Solution

A method that utilizes positional and temporal information to validate face detection and recognition by calculating a consistency score based on historical data, using face feature points like corners of the eyes, lips, and nose, and applying a score transformation function to improve detection and recognition accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If multiple sensors are used to track individuals across different areas, then the coverage and tracking capability are improved, but the consistency of positional and temporal information becomes difficult to maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurveillance coverage areaVSAvoidpositional and temporal information consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs consistency checks by comparing newly determined positional and temporal information with previously stored information, using feedback loops to validate detection scores and recognition scores. This feedback mechanism ensures that tracking information remains consistent across multiple sensors while maintaining broad surveillance coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system stores positional and temporal information in advance as historical data before consistency checks are performed. By preparing reference data beforehand, the system can efficiently validate new detections against established patterns, ensuring reliability across the extended surveillance area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If biometric recognition is used to identify individuals, then the recognition capability is improved, but the detection accuracy may be reduced due to false positives

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual recognition capabilityVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback loops to validate biometric recognition results by checking consistency between newly detected biometric characteristics and previously stored information. Detection scores and recognition scores are adjusted based on this consistency validation, reducing false positives while maintaining strong individual recognition capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies multiple layers of validation including consistency checks, score transformations, and temporal verification beyond what a single biometric comparison would provide. This excessive validation approach ensures high detection accuracy while maintaining the versatility of biometric recognition across different individuals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If consistency checks are performed on all detected individuals, then the detection accuracy is improved, but the processing time and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidsystem processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies consistency checks selectively based on local conditions, such as the detection score thresholds and the specific sensor contexts. Not all detections undergo the same level of validation, allowing the system to maintain high detection accuracy while managing processing complexity through differentiated validation strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts parameters such as detection score thresholds and validation intensity based on operational conditions. By changing these parameters, the system can optimize the balance between detection accuracy and processing complexity, applying more rigorous checks only when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3285209B1Monitoring method using a multi-sensor system
Publication Date: 2022.08.03 IDEMIA IDENTITY & SECURITY FRANCE SAS
  • EP3285209B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2

AI summary

A method for monitoring a location using an array of image sensors connected to a biometric recognition device arranged to extract biometric characteristics of individuals from images provided by the sensors and to compare the biometric characteristics extracted from images from separate sensors to detect the presence of the same individual based on a proximity score between the biometric characteristics, the method comprising the steps of determining positional and temporal information representative of an intermediate time between the two images and verifying consistency between the newly determined positional and temporal information and the previously stored positional and temporal information.