Surveillance Planning Device for Camera Installation Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Installation engineers and non-expert purchasers face difficulties in selecting optimal camera locations and types for surveillance systems, often requiring multiple installation and disassembly attempts to achieve desired angles and positions, and struggle to choose appropriate cameras for specific locations.

Innovation Solution

A surveillance planning device that collects spatial and object information from user terminals, generates checklists, recommends suitable devices and installation locations, and provides simulation results for optimal camera placement and settings, allowing users to efficiently purchase and install security devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If installation engineers or purchasers manually select camera locations and types based on experience and site inspection, then professional judgment can be applied, but the process requires multiple installation and disassembly attempts to achieve desired angles and positions, increasing time consumption and complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecamera installation accuracyVSAvoidinstallation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of the installation site using captured images to automatically determine optimal camera locations, angles, and types before actual installation. This pre-planning phase generates a detailed installation plan that guides the physical installation process, eliminating the need for multiple trial-and-error installation attempts and significantly reducing on-site installation time while maintaining high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If purchasers attempt to select optimal camera locations without expertise, then independence and ease of purchase is improved, but selection accuracy and optimal placement deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of camera selectionVSAvoidcamera location accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables purchasers to independently perform camera selection and location planning without requiring professional expertise. Users capture images of the installation site using their mobile device, and the system automatically analyzes the images to generate optimal camera placement recommendations, device type suggestions, and installation angles. This self-service approach democratizes the selection process while maintaining high accuracy through automated image analysis algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple installation attempts are made to achieve desired camera angles and positions, then installation precision can be improved, but device complexity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation precisionVSAvoidinstallation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs comprehensive pre-installation analysis by processing captured site images to determine optimal camera locations, mounting heights, angles, and orientations before any physical installation occurs. The generated installation plan includes precise positioning guidance and device selection recommendations, allowing installers to execute the plan in a single attempt rather than requiring multiple adjustment cycles, thereby simplifying the installation process while maintaining high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If camera selection is left to non-experts, then accessibility and ease of purchase is improved, but ability to select appropriate camera types for specific locations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser accessibilityVSAvoidcamera type selection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system empowers non-expert purchasers to reliably select appropriate camera types for their specific locations through automated image analysis. The system processes site images to understand the surveillance requirements, then recommends suitable camera models and specifications tailored to each location's characteristics. This self-service mechanism combines user accessibility with expert-level selection reliability by leveraging automated computer vision and device matching algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12106345B2Surveillance planning device and method for providing security device installation solution using same
Publication Date: 2024.10.01 HANWHA VISION CO LTD
  • US12106345B2 patent drawing
  • US12106345B2 patent drawing
  • US12106345B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a surveillance planning device configured to generate a checklist with respect to a region based on spatial information and object information of the region, obtain device installation condition information based on a user response to the checklist, and recommend, to a user, a list of devices to be installed in the region and an installation location of the devices based on the spatial information, the object information, and the device installation condition information.