Surveillance System Detecting Network Alert Conditions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Data networks face challenges in distinguishing between malicious and non-malicious activities due to the vast amount of data generated, making automated surveillance difficult and beyond the scale of manual human intervention.

Innovation Solution

An electronic surveillance system that learns filter parameters through historical datasets using machine-learning techniques, applying a multi-tiered or multi-branched approach to detect alert conditions by evaluating input data against learned and user-defined parameters, and generating alerts for abnormal deviations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated surveillance is implemented to handle vast amounts of data, then detection capability is improved, but system complexity increases beyond manual human intervention scale

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The surveillance system segments the monitoring process into multiple independent components: data collection modules, machine learning analysis modules, filter parameter evaluation modules, and alert generation modules. Each component processes specific aspects of network data independently, enabling scalable automated surveillance without overwhelming system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces machine learning models and filter parameters as intermediary elements between raw network data and security alerts. These intermediaries automatically interpret complex data patterns, translating them into actionable insights without requiring direct human analysis of the vast data volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If machine-learning techniques are used to learn filter parameters from historical datasets, then detection accuracy is improved, but computational resources and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary learning of filter parameters from historical datasets during a calibration phase before actual surveillance operations begin. This preliminary action pre-computes the necessary detection criteria, allowing the system to operate efficiently during production without continuously consuming heavy computational resources for learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a simplified representation of network behavior patterns through learned filter parameters that capture essential characteristics without storing the entire historical dataset. This copying approach retains detection accuracy while significantly reducing the computational burden during active surveillance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If multi-tiered or multi-branched approaches are used to learn and apply filter parameters, then adaptability to different data sources is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to data sourcesVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the surveillance functionality into separate tiers or branches, each handling specific data sources or detection scenarios. This segmentation allows the system to adapt to different data sources independently while maintaining a consistent overall architecture that manages complexity through modular organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20220294809A1Large scale surveillance of data networks to detect alert conditions
Publication Date: 2022.09.15 REFINITIV US ORGANIZATION LLC
  • US20220294809A1 patent drawing
  • US20220294809A1 patent drawing
  • US20220294809A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods may detect alert conditions in data networks. An electronic surveillance system may learn filter parameters during a learning phase and apply the filter parameters to detect the alert conditions during a detecting phase. In the learning phase, the electronic surveillance system may learn filter parameters based on patterns in historical datasets. The electronic surveillance system may learn and evaluate the input dataset against one or more filter parameters to determine whether the input dataset should trigger an alert condition. For example, the electronic surveillance system may learn one or more filter parameters through statistical analyses, which may include machine-learning techniques. The electronic surveillance system may further match text in a dictionary filter parameter with communications, which may relate to the input datasets, to determine whether to trigger an alert condition.