Grounded Susceptor Electrode Layout for Parasitic Plasma Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional plasma apparatuses often generate parasitic plasma in undesired locations within the reaction chamber, leading to decreased film thickness uniformity and film residue deposition.

Innovation Solution

A susceptor assembly with a body, a heater element, a first electrode, and a second electrode, where the second electrode is electrically grounded to suppress parasitic plasma around the side and bottom surfaces, while the first electrode generates processing plasma above the substrate support surface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If a conventional plasma apparatus is used, then plasma processing can be performed, but parasitic plasma is generated in undesired locations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparasitic plasmaVSAvoidfilm thickness uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The plasma generation process is segmented into two distinct zones: a processing plasma zone above the substrate support surface for intended processing, and a suppressed plasma zone at side and bottom surfaces where parasitic plasma would form. The second electrode is strategically positioned to create this spatial segmentation, allowing controlled plasma generation only where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the plasma environment are given different qualities: the region above the substrate support surface is designed to support plasma generation for processing, while the regions at side and bottom surfaces are designed to suppress plasma formation. This local differentiation of plasma properties eliminates parasitic plasma without affecting the main processing zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional plasma apparatus is used, then plasma processing can be performed, but film residue deposition occurs on reactor surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilm residue depositionVSAvoidsubstrate processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The harmful effect of film residue deposition is extracted and eliminated by suppressing plasma formation at the side and bottom surfaces of the susceptor assembly. By preventing parasitic plasma generation in these regions, the source of film residue deposition is removed, while the main processing function above the substrate remains intact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If a second electrode is added to suppress parasitic plasma, then parasitic plasma is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparasitic plasmaVSAvoidsusceptor assembly structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The second electrode is merged with the susceptor assembly body, forming an integrated structure where the electrode and susceptor become a unified component. This integration minimizes additional complexity by combining multiple functions (substrate support, heating, and plasma suppression) into a single assembled unit rather than separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively suppresses parasitic plasma, improving film thickness uniformity and reducing film residue, thereby enhancing the overall efficiency and quality of substrate processing in plasma reactors.

Implementation Method 1

The second electrode is configured to be electrically grounded to suppress parasitic plasma around at least one of the side surface and the bottom surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma suppression through electrical grounding: Electric Field

Implementation Method 2

the first electrode is configured to operably generate a processing plasma above the top surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma generation: Plasma

Implementation Method 3

The reactor system may include a capacitively coupled plasma configuration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitively coupled plasma: Capacitance

Implementation Method 4

one or both of the substrate and the susceptor may be heated to a desired temperature set point

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS12347644B2Susceptor assembly for plasma apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.07.01 ASM IP HLDG BV
  • US12347644B2 patent drawing
  • US12347644B2 patent drawing
  • US12347644B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A susceptor assembly for a reactor system may provide various plasma control benefits. The susceptor assembly includes a body, a heater element, a first electrode, and a second electrode, according to various embodiments. The body may have a top surface, a side surface, and a bottom surface, wherein the top surface is a substrate support surface. The heater element may be embedded within the body. The first and second electrodes may also be embedded within the body of the susceptor assembly, with the first electrode disposed between the heater element and the top surface of the body. The second electrode may be generally disposed proximate at least one of the side surface and the bottom surface.