Suspended Animal Enclosure with Remote Pivot Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current animal trapping systems are ineffective in controlling large populations of intelligent and wary feral hogs due to their ability to recognize and avoid traps, and existing systems are often cumbersome, require significant space and effort, or are not portable.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a suspended enclosure that can be remotely controlled to move from a raised to a lowered position, using a concentrically arranged design with a pivotable member and actuator to enclose animals, along with a control system for remote operation and monitoring.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional animal-actuated traps are used, then trap effectiveness against individual animals may be achieved, but the traps are ineffective in controlling large populations of intelligent and wary feral hogs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepopulation control effectivenessVSAvoidanimal intelligence and wariness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The trap system is divided into multiple independent panels that can be configured to form different enclosure sizes and shapes. This segmentation allows the system to handle multiple animals simultaneously while maintaining simplicity in each individual panel design, thereby improving population control effectiveness without requiring complex mechanisms that might alert wary animals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses removable panels and pre-assembled components that can be quickly deployed and configured before animals arrive. This preliminary preparation eliminates the need for complex on-site assembly that might suspicious to intelligent animals, while enabling rapid population control through immediate trapping capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If large corral-like structures are constructed to capture larger numbers of feral animals, then trapping capacity increases, but the structures require considerable space, time and effort to construct and deconstruct

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrapping capacityVSAvoidconstruction and deconstruction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The corral structure is divided into multiple removable panels that can be quickly assembled and disassembled. Each panel is a standalone component that can be independently handled, allowing the entire structure to be constructed or deconstructed in a fraction of the time required for traditional fixed corrals, while maintaining large trapping capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static fixed corrals to dynamic reconfigurable structures. Panels can be rapidly assembled, disassembled, and reconfigured to adapt to different trapping needs and locations, dramatically reducing the time and effort required for construction and deconstruction while maintaining high trapping capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If fixed corral systems with panels extending from the ground are used, then trapping of multiple animals is achieved, but the systems are not readily portable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-animal trapping capabilityVSAvoidportability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The corral system is segmented into multiple removable panels that can be easily transported to different locations. Each panel is designed as an independent, portable component that can be carried and assembled on-site, enabling the system to maintain multi-animal trapping capability while being readily portable to various trapping locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The panels utilize lightweight, flexible materials that maintain structural integrity while being easy to transport. This allows the system to preserve its multi-animal trapping capability without requiring heavy, fixed structures, thereby achieving both effective trapping and portability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

4Productivity

If suspended trap systems with heavy-duty lift systems are used, then trapping capability is improved, but the systems require impractical or costly structures or complex cabling/pulleys

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrapping capabilityVSAvoidlift system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex heavy-duty lift systems, cabling, and pulleys are completely removed from the design. Instead, the system uses simple removable panels that rest directly on the ground or are easily positioned, eliminating the need for impractical or costly support structures while maintaining effective trapping capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The trap system is designed to be self-positioning and self-supporting through its panel configuration, eliminating the need for external lift systems. The panels themselves provide the structural support needed for trapping, thereby simplifying the overall system while preserving trapping capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9668467B2Systems and methods for trapping animals
Publication Date: 2017.06.06 NOBLE RESEARCH INSTITUTE LLC
  • US9668467B2 patent drawing
  • US9668467B2 patent drawing
  • US9668467B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and methods for trapping animals including an enclosure adapted to be suspended above a trap area. The enclosure may be movable from the suspended position to a lowered position to enclose a trap area. The system further includes a user-directed control system to remotely control the position of the enclosure in order to trap animals within the enclosure.