Multi-Link Suspension Geometry for Independent Camber Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing multi-link independent suspensions face reduced adjustment efficiency due to mutual restraining of linkages when adjusting camber angles, which complicates four-wheel alignment and affects suspension durability.

Innovation Solution

A multi-link independent suspension design that includes a front upper control arm, rear upper control arm, spring control arm, front lower control arm, and toe-in adjustment arm, where the spring control arm moves to adjust camber angles independently of toe-in angles, minimizing linkage interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If complex linkage structure is used to achieve multi-directional force control, then handling performance and riding comfort are improved, but adjustment efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling performanceVSAvoidadjustment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex linkage structure is segmented into modular functional groups with clear division of labor. The upper control arm system handles camber control while the toe-in adjustment arm handles toe-in control, allowing each module to be adjusted independently without affecting others, thus improving adjustment efficiency while maintaining the comprehensive force control capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each linkage component is designed with specialized functionality: the spring control arm system provides camber control and ride comfort, while the toe-in adjustment arm provides toe-in control and handling stability. This multi-functional design allows the complex linkage system to achieve various adjustment objectives through independent operation of each component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If multiple linkages are used to control forces in multiple directions, then riding comfort is improved, but linkage mutual restraint increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveriding comfortVSAvoidlinkage complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The linkage system is segmented into independent functional modules where each module controls specific force directions. The spring control arm system controls vertical and camber-related forces, while the toe-in adjustment arm controls lateral and toe-in forces. This segmentation reduces mutual restraint by establishing clear functional boundaries between linkages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Manufacturing precision

If spring control arm is used to adjust camber angle, then camber control is achieved, but adjustment time increases due to linkage interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecamber angle control precisionVSAvoidadjustment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The adjustment system is segmented into independent camber control and toe-in control subsystems. When camber angle adjustment is needed, only the spring control arm system needs to be adjusted without affecting the toe-in adjustment arm, and vice versa. This independence eliminates the time-consuming iterative adjustments previously required to compensate for linkage interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12275286B2Multi-link independent suspension for vehicle, and vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.04.15 NIO TECH ANHUI CO LTD
  • US12275286B2 patent drawing
  • US12275286B2 patent drawing
  • US12275286B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure relates to the technical field of vehicles, and particularly provides a multi-link independent suspension for a vehicle that includes a subframe and a steering knuckle. In order to solve the problem of reduced adjustment efficiency caused by mutual restraining of linkages of an existing multi-link independent suspension when a camber angle is adjusted, the multi-link independent suspension includes a spring control arm that is configured to adjust a camber angle of a wheel center. The multi-link independent suspension also includes a front upper control arm and a rear upper control arm. A central axis of the front upper control arm intersects with a central axis of the rear upper control arm at a Q point, and the Q point has the same coordinate as the wheel center in an X direction; and a motion centerline between the front upper control arm and the rear upper control arm coincides with a projection of a central axis of the spring control arm on an XY plane, so that a movement of the spring control arm has no effect on an upper control arm system when the camber angle is being adjusted. The steering knuckle only rotates about an X axis so as to drive a tire to rotate about the X axis, so that a camber angle of the tire can be adjusted without changing a toe-in angle, thereby reducing the number of affected linkages and simplifying the adjustment in the camber angle of the tire.