Suspension Control Device Road Surface Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing suspension control devices fail to appropriately control damping force in accordance with varying road surface conditions, affecting vehicle stability and ride comfort.

Innovation Solution

A suspension control device that includes a road surface determining section and a control variable calculating section, which calculates a steering-based desired control variable using a threshold setting section, multiplying section, and selecting section, referencing steering torque signals to adjust damping force based on road surface conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the damping force is controlled based on steering torque only, then the suspension responds to driver input, but it fails to adapt to varying road surface conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAdaptability to road surface conditionsVSAvoidControl system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts the damping force control strategy based on detected road surface conditions. When rough road surfaces are detected, the system switches to a control mode that prioritizes ride comfort over steering responsiveness, and vice versa for smooth surfaces. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to handle varying road conditions effectively without requiring completely separate control systems for different scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the control parameters (damping force characteristics) based on detected road surface conditions. By modifying the damping force calculation parameters according to the roughness level, the system achieves adaptability to different road surfaces while using the same fundamental control structure, thus balancing adaptability with acceptable system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the damping force is increased to handle rough roads, then ride comfort improves, but steering responsiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRide comfort on rough roadsVSAvoidSteering responsiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts damping force characteristics based on real-time road surface detection. When rough roads are detected, the system increases damping force to improve ride comfort. When smooth roads are detected, it reduces damping force to maintain steering responsiveness. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to optimize for either ride comfort or steering responsiveness depending on current road conditions, rather than being fixed at one setting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system continuously monitors road surface conditions and periodically adjusts damping force characteristics accordingly. This periodic reevaluation and adjustment allows the system to maintain optimal performance by switching between comfort-oriented and responsiveness-oriented damping characteristics as road conditions change during vehicle operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Measurement precision

If multiple control variables are calculated and selected, then control precision improves, but calculation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveControl variable precisionVSAvoidControl calculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control variable calculation is segmented into multiple candidate calculations, each optimized for different road surface conditions. The system calculates multiple potential control variables (first candidate, second candidate, etc.) and then selects the most appropriate one based on detected road conditions. This segmentation allows precise control for each condition type while keeping the selection logic relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from road surface detection to select the appropriate control variable from multiple candidates. The detection result feeds back into the control variable selection process, allowing the system to choose the most suitable control variable based on current conditions. This feedback mechanism enables precise control adaptation without requiring complex real-time calculations for all possible scenarios simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11465460B2Suspension control device and suspension device
Publication Date: 2022.10.11 ASTEMO LTD
  • US11465460B2 patent drawing
  • US11465460B2 patent drawing
  • US11465460B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A road surface condition is determined appropriately. A road surface determining section (84) configured to determine a road surface state includes a threshold setting section (845) configured to set a threshold for determining the road surface state, so that a value of a desired control variable is multiplied by a coefficient determined in accordance with a result of the determination by the road surface determining section (84).