Suspension Damping Control for Brake-Free Vehicle Yaw Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control methods that adjust traveling direction through braking consume excessive energy and cause abrasion of the braking system, and fail to provide flexible control during steering.

Innovation Solution

A suspension control method that adjusts the deformation parameter, particularly the damping of the shock absorber, to align the vehicle's actual yaw velocity with the desired yaw velocity, reducing the need for braking and enhancing control stability and comfort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If braking measures are used to adjust traveling direction, then vehicle direction control is achieved, but energy consumption increases and braking system abrasion occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle direction controlVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the suspension system by adjusting the deformation parameter (such as damping coefficient or spring stiffness) to control vehicle attitude and traveling direction. This replaces the traditional braking method with a suspension parameter adjustment method, thereby reducing energy consumption and avoiding braking system wear while achieving direction control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If braking measures are used to adjust traveling direction, then vehicle direction control is achieved, but braking system abrasion occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle direction controlVSAvoidbraking system durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adjusts the deformation parameter of the suspension to control vehicle direction, thereby eliminating the need for braking operations. This approach prevents braking system abrasion and extends the durability and reliability of the braking system while maintaining effective direction control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Use of energy by moving object

If deformation parameter of suspension is adjusted, then traveling direction is controlled without braking, but control precision must be maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy conservationVSAvoidyaw velocity control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs feedback control by determining an association relationship between predicted yaw velocity and the deformation parameter of the suspension. The system continuously monitors the deviation between desired and predicted yaw velocities, and adjusts the deformation parameter accordingly to minimize this deviation, thereby maintaining high control precision while conserving energy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent determines the association relationship between predicted yaw velocity and deformation parameter in advance based on vehicle status parameters. This preliminary determination allows the system to proactively adjust the suspension deformation parameter to achieve the desired yaw velocity, improving control precision before deviations occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If association relationship is determined based on multiple status parameters, then control accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyaw velocity prediction accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses multiple existing vehicle status parameters (lateral acceleration, side slip angle, steering angle, longitudinal speed, roll angle, roll angle velocity) that are typically already measured by the vehicle's sensor system. By utilizing these multi-functional parameters for determining the association relationship, the system achieves high prediction accuracy without significantly increasing overall system complexity, as these parameters serve multiple control functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method effectively adjusts the vehicle's traveling direction without braking, conserving energy, reducing braking system wear, and improving control stability and comfort by aligning predicted and desired yaw velocities.

Implementation Method 1

the suspension includes a shock absorber, and the deformation parameter of the suspension includes damping of the shock absorber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDamping: Damping

Data Source

PatentEP4206005B1Suspension control method, and vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.08.27 YINWANG INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGIES CO LTD
  • EP4206005B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4206005B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP4206005B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7

AI summary

A suspension control method is provided. The suspension control method includes: determining that a vehicle performs steering; and adjusting a deformation parameter of a suspension in response to the determining of the steering, to adjust a traveling direction of the vehicle. Further, a suspension control apparatus, a computer program storage medium, a chip, and a vehicle are provided. When the vehicle performs steering, the traveling direction of the vehicle is adjusted by controlling the deformation parameter of the suspension of the vehicle without performing braking measures. This avoids large energy consumption and abrasion of a vehicle braking system.