Bicycle Suspension Fork Air Volume Tuning for Stable Spring Rate

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing bicycle suspension forks experience pressure spikes and speed-sensitive return forces due to the casting ramp spring effect, which affects spring rate and consistency, leading to inconsistent riding feel.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating an increased internal air volume within the lower tube of the suspension fork, utilizing a housing to expand the casting volume capacity and reduce pressure spikes during compression, thereby minimizing the influence of the casting ramp spring effect.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the casting volume capacity is increased to reduce pressure spikes, then the spring rate consistency is improved, but the device complexity increases due to additional housing and volume control elements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespring rate consistencyVSAvoidfork structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The volume control element is nested within the lower tube assembly, with the seal element positioned between the first and second tubes to define the increased casting volume. This nested configuration allows the volume control element to be integrated into the existing fork structure without requiring separate external components, thereby reducing overall device complexity while still achieving the goal of increased casting volume capacity for more consistent spring rate

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the volume parameter of the casting chamber by positioning the seal element to increase the casting volume capacity. This parameter change directly addresses the pressure spike issue during compression while maintaining structural simplicity through the integrated seal element design that modifies the existing volume rather than adding separate expansion chambers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the casting volume capacity is increased to reduce speed sensitivity, then the damping performance consistency is improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases due to precise sealing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamping performance consistencyVSAvoidsealing assembly manufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The seal element is configured to work in conjunction with the volume control element to create a homogeneous sealing interface between the first and second tubes. This homogeneous sealing approach ensures consistent sealing performance across the increased casting volume while simplifying manufacturing by using a single integrated seal element rather than multiple separate sealing components that would require complex assembly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

Solution Approach 2:

The seal element is nested within the telescoping tube assembly, positioned to seal between the first tube and second tube. This nested positioning allows the seal to be integrated into the existing manufacturing process of the telescoping tubes without requiring separate sealing assembly steps, thereby improving ease of manufacture while achieving the required sealing for increased casting volume capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The increased air volume reduces pressure spikes and speed sensitivity, providing a more consistent riding experience by stabilizing the spring rate and damping performance.

Implementation Method 1

utilizing a housing to expand the casting volume capacity and reduce pressure spikes during compression

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas compressibility: Compression

Data Source

PatentEP4667342A1Suspension forks for bicycles
Publication Date: 2025.12.24 SRAM LLC
  • EP4667342A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4667342A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4667342A1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

Suspension forks for bicycles are described herein. An example suspension fork (200) includes a first tube (222) and a second tube (226) slidably received within the first tube. The first tube includes an outer mounting portion. A first volume (326) is disposed between the first tube and the second tube. A sealing element (380) is provided for sealing the first volume between the first tube and the second tube. A volume control element is removably attachable to the outer mounting portion of the first tube, wherein the volume control element is operable to change a magnitude of the first volume disposed between the first tube and the second tube.