Sustainability Analysis System for Architectural Design Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Architects face challenges in optimizing architectural structure designs for sustainability, leading to increased time and delays in achieving compliance with green building standards, as existing methods lack efficient tools for analyzing and integrating sustainable design options effectively.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for analyzing and designing architectural structures using a web-based platform that integrates computer-assisted design (CAD) tools, allowing for the application and comparison of multiple design options based on geographic location data, energy, water, and resource usage, to improve sustainability and compliance with building standards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If architects manually optimize design for sustainability goals, then sustainability performance improves, but design time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesustainability performanceVSAvoiddesign time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates and stores sustainability performance data for multiple design options before the actual design optimization process. By having sustainability metrics pre-computed and readily available, architects can quickly compare and select optimal designs without performing time-consuming manual calculations during the design phase, thus improving sustainability performance while reducing design time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses three-dimensional data and location-related data to create virtual models and simulations of architectural structures. By working with digital copies and simulations rather than physical prototypes or manual calculations, the system enables rapid iteration and optimization of sustainability performance without the time constraints of physical testing or manual computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple design options are analyzed in detail, then design quality improves, but development schedule is delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign qualityVSAvoiddevelopment speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a multi-level analysis approach where design options are first screened using automated preliminary assessments, and only the most promising options undergo detailed analysis. This partial action strategy ensures that detailed analysis is applied selectively rather than uniformly to all options, maintaining high design quality for critical decisions while avoiding unnecessary delays from over-analyzing every possibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The analysis process is divided into distinct segments: automated preliminary screening, selective detailed analysis, and final evaluation. By segmenting the analysis workflow, the system can efficiently process multiple design options through automated routines and reserve detailed manual analysis for only those options that require it, thereby maintaining design quality while accelerating the overall development schedule.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If comprehensive sustainability analysis is performed, then compliance with green building standards improves, but time to submit design documents increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance accuracyVSAvoidsubmission time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides real-time feedback on sustainability performance and compliance status throughout the design process. By continuously monitoring and reporting on how well design options meet green building standards, architects can make immediate adjustments to ensure compliance without waiting until the end of the design process, thereby maintaining high compliance accuracy while reducing the time needed for final submissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary compliance checks and generates preliminary sustainability reports early in the design process. By having compliance data prepared in advance rather than compiling it at the last moment, architects can ensure accurate compliance assessment while meeting submission deadlines, as the comprehensive analysis is already completed or near-complete when documents need to be submitted.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8768655B2System and method for analyzing and designing an architectural structure using bundles of design strategies applied according to a priority
Publication Date: 2014.07.01 SEFAIRA INC
  • US8768655B2 patent drawing
  • US8768655B2 patent drawing
  • US8768655B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to various embodiments of the invention, systems and methods are provided for analyzing and designing architectural structures. Such embodiments may be utilized by architects and engineers as tools that assist in designing architectural structures that achieve specific design goals, such as those related to sustainability. For example, an embodiment may comprise a system that: (i) provides a sustainability analysis on an architectural structure design created using a computer-assisted design (CAD) tool, and then (ii) applies a design option to that design (e.g., changes to orientation of building on a project site, size of fenestrations on the structure, choice of wall insulation, etc.) to improve its sustainability. In addition, various embodiments may be accessed through a web-based platform, which provides a user with easier access and better collaboration between and among design team members.