Sustainability Rating System Using Dynamic Weighting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Investors lack a standardized method to assess the societal and environmental impact of companies and governments, making it difficult to compare their sustainability and make informed investment decisions.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented rating system that computes a sustainability score using non-economic factors, allowing users to input weightings and display formulas, enabling customized sustainability ratings for companies and governments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a standardized rating system for sustainability is implemented, then investors can make informed decisions by comparing companies on societal and environmental impact, but the system complexity increases due to incorporating multiple non-economic factors and customizable weightings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesustainability assessment accuracyVSAvoidrating system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sustainability rating system is segmented into multiple independent modules: data collection module, weighting configuration module, scoring calculation module, and reporting module. Each module handles specific non-economic factors (environmental, social, governance) separately, allowing investors to assess each dimension independently while maintaining overall system precision without overwhelming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates dynamic weighting capabilities where investors can adjust the importance of different non-economic factors based on their preferences. The weighting parameters are stored in a database and can be modified without reprogramming the entire system, enabling flexible adaptation to different investment philosophies while maintaining a standardized assessment framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple non-economic factors are incorporated into the rating system, then the sustainability assessment becomes more comprehensive, but the data collection and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesustainability assessment coverageVSAvoiddata volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The rating system is designed as a universal platform that can assess multiple types of legal entities (companies, governments, organizations) using the same core framework of non-economic factors. The system handles environmental, social, and governance data through unified processing algorithms, reducing redundant data collection efforts while maintaining comprehensive assessment coverage across diverse entities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms diverse non-economic data (qualitative and quantitative) into standardized parameters that can be processed uniformly. By converting various data types into comparable metric units and applying normalization techniques, the system reduces data volume requirements while preserving the comprehensive nature of sustainability assessment across multiple factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8255271B2Sustainability ratings for legal entities with data inspection
Publication Date: 2012.08.28 THOMSON REUTERS ENTERPRISE CENTRE GMBH
  • US8255271B2 patent drawing
  • US8255271B2 patent drawing
  • US8255271B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer implemented rating system for rating a company using at least one non-economic factor stored in a database populated with hierarchical data and metadata. The system displays at least a portion of the hierarchical data and a formula that generates a sustainability score, the sustainability score defining a rating of the company incorporating the at least one non-economic factor. The user can input at weightings into the system which associates each weighting with a respective non-economic factor. A processor computes the sustainability score using the formula by mathematically applying each associated user-input weighting to the respective non-economic factor. The system displays the sustainability score, and, in response to a user interaction, displays at least a portion of the hierarchical data including the metadata. The hierarchical data can include a second level of data which is used to compute the first level by applying weightings in a formula.