Swap Control System Designation in Computing Clusters
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing systems for designating a control system in a computing cluster for swap operations often lead to suboptimal choices, such as selecting a low-weighted system, due to equal capabilities among peer systems and a 'first come first serve' approach.
Innovation Solution
A method that determines the processing unit resource capacity and swap capability of each computing system in a peer group, and designates the system with the highest CPU capacity score among those with the greatest swap capability as the control system for swap operations.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Device complexity
If a first come first serve approach is used to designate control system, then the designation process is simple, but the selected system may have low processing unit capacity and poor swap capability
Solution Approach 1:
The patent changes the selection parameters from simple temporal ordering (first come first serve) to quantitative metrics including processing unit capacity, swap capability, and system weight. This allows the system to evaluate and select the most capable computing system based on multiple performance parameters rather than arbitrary temporal factors.
Solution Approach 2:
Each computing system in the peer group autonomously evaluates its own capabilities and participates in the selection process. The systems self-assess their processing unit capacity and swap capability, and the designation is determined through their relative performance metrics without requiring external intervention.
2Ease of operation
If equal capability assumption is made among peer systems, then the designation rule is straightforward, but it leads to suboptimal control system selection
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces multiple evaluation parameters (processing unit capacity, swap capability, system weight) to replace the simplistic equal capability assumption. This enables differentiated selection based on actual system performance characteristics, improving swap operation efficiency while maintaining automated designation.
3Stability of the object's composition
If static designation is used, then the control system assignment is stable, but it cannot adapt to dynamic changes in system capacity
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements dynamic reevaluation of computing system capabilities at designated intervals or upon triggering events. The control system designation is not fixed but can be reassigned when system conditions change, allowing the system to adapt to dynamic capacity changes while maintaining operational stability through structured reevaluation processes.
Data Source
AI summary
Designation of a swap control system in a group of peers within a computing cluster includes determining a processing unit resource capacity for each of a plurality of computing systems in a peer group within a computing cluster, and determining a swap capability for each of the plurality of computing systems. Designation of a swap control system in a group of peers within a computing cluster further includes designating one of the plurality of computing systems as a control system for a swap operation within the peer group based on the processing unit resource capacity and the swap capability of the designated one of the plurality of computing systems relative to the processing unit resource capacity and the swap capability of each of the other computing systems of the plurality of computing systems.