Swappable Battery Charge State Control for Electric Power Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electric power systems for vehicles, such as electric scooters, face challenges with swappable batteries, including the lack of individual control over charge states, which can lead to voltage differences causing damage and potential fires when swapping batteries without proper power management.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that determine the charge states of multiple swappable battery units and decide whether to enable simultaneous or separate discharging based on the charge state differences, using a power control circuit with a microprocessor to manage the battery units and prevent damage by controlling the discharge of each unit independently.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If swappable battery units are used without individual charge state control, then battery swapping speed is improved, but voltage difference between battery units increases causing damage and fire hazards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery swapping speedVSAvoidbattery safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The power control circuit continuously monitors the charge state of each battery unit and uses this feedback information to control the discharge process. The system adjusts discharge parameters based on real-time charge state data, ensuring that voltage differences remain within safe limits while enabling rapid battery swapping operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes discharge parameters (such as discharge current and voltage thresholds) based on the charge state of individual battery units. By adjusting these parameters in real-time, the system prevents harmful voltage differences while maintaining high swapping productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Power

If simultaneous discharging of multiple battery units is enabled without charge state monitoring, then power output is improved, but voltage instability increases leading to system damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower outputVSAvoidvoltage stability
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the discharging process based on real-time charge state monitoring. When battery units have similar charge states, simultaneous discharging is enabled for maximum power output. When charge states diverge, the system dynamically switches to sequential discharging or adjusts parameters to maintain voltage stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The power control circuit uses feedback from charge state measurements to control simultaneous discharging. The system continuously monitors voltage levels and adjusts discharge parameters or switches between simultaneous and sequential modes to maintain voltage stability while optimizing power output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If individual charge state control is implemented for each battery unit, then battery safety is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery safetyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The power control circuit performs multiple functions: it monitors charge states, controls discharge parameters, prevents over-discharge, and manages voltage stability. By consolidating these functions into a single multi-functional control system, individual battery safety is improved without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Each battery unit's charge state is independently monitored and controlled, allowing the system to manage multiple batteries using the same control logic and algorithms. This self-service approach enables safe individual control without requiring complex specialized circuits for each battery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11621572B2Method of operating an electric power system, electric power system, and computer executable code
Publication Date: 2023.04.04 GRABTAXI HOLDINGS PTE LTD
  • US11621572B2 patent drawing
  • US11621572B2 patent drawing
  • US11621572B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of operating an electric power system, which may include: determining a charge state of a first battery unit and a charge state of a second battery unit; determining a difference between the charge state of the first battery unit and the charge state of the second battery unit; and determining whether to enable discharging simultaneously of both the first battery unit and the second battery unit, or to enable discharging of one of the first and second battery units, based on the difference between the charge state of the first battery unit and the charge state of the second battery unit. At least one of the first and second battery units may be a swappable battery unit. The disclosure further relates to an electric power system and to a computer executable code including instructions for operating an electric power system.